Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur
As usual sink...you're evading the issue by discussing apples and oranges.

Answer the question: What rights taken by CLINTON have been restored under BUSH? C'mon, even you and your little lurking buddies over at NSA can handle this one.

"You can't own a cannon either. So what?"

Even if I could, I can't afford a cannon, nor would I have a safe place to discharge it. Can't afford a PSG 1 but at least I'd have a place to shoot it safely. And I sure as hell can afford all that lovely ammo at bargain basement prices. Until Bush 41. Then Clinton made it worse. Why hasn't Bush 43 returned us to the status quo ante? This is an important question with Bush 43 claiming title to being a "strict constructionist" when it comes to the US Constitution.

89 posted on 08/28/2002 9:40:37 PM PDT by ExSoldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: ExSoldier
This is an important question with Bush 43 claiming title to being a "strict constructionist" when it comes to the US Constitution.

He fooled a lotta folks with that line. Heck, at this juncture, Judge Mathis is more credible.

97 posted on 08/28/2002 10:04:51 PM PDT by takenoprisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

To: ExSoldier
If the INS was run like the BATF, every illegal alien in America would be arrested, deported, shot or burned alive in one month.

If the BATF was run like the INS, you could keep howitzers in your backyard and fire them across town morning noon and night.

(I just want a list of which laws "really count", and which laws I can ignore.)

205 posted on 08/29/2002 7:49:38 AM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson