Battered Republican Syndrome (Ann Coulter does not agree with Sean Hannity that liberals are good)

worldnetdaily ^ | 8/28/2002 | Ann Coulter

[TLBSHOW]

Battered Republican Syndrome

For my escapist summer reading at the beach this week, I've been flipping through Sean Hannity's fabulous new book, "Let Freedom Ring." It's a fine book, with many excellent illustrations of how consistently wrong liberals have been for half a century, give or take a few years. But I must take issue with Sean on one point.

Perplexingly, he writes: "The vast majority of liberals are good, sincere, well-meaning people." This cheery bonhomie is beginning to sound like the mantra about the "vast majority" of Muslims being peaceful and has produced the same good results. I think it's time to drop the infernal nonsense about liberals being well-intentioned but misguided. In the spirit of Hannityesque magnanimity, I will say that there is only one thing wrong with liberals: They're no good.

As Hannity notes, liberals never reciprocate the love conservatives keep sending their way. They don't like us. They don't even think we're human. Of this, I am eternally grateful.

Some of the other things liberals believe are:

to move beyond discrimination, we must discriminate;

girls would make excellent Marines;

running gay marriage announcements in the wedding pages will lead to greater acceptance of homosexuality.

They are wrong about everything. Why would anyone want to be liked by these people?

It's sort of cute when Sean's hail-fellow-well-met approach toward liberals is greeted with dismissive grunts. For one thing, I think well enough of Sean to believe he doesn't really mean it. But how many times must we endure a Republican politician droning on about what a fine human being some heinous Democrat is and what a pleasure it was to work with him, only to have the heinous Democrat grudgingly issue some backhanded compliment about the Republican finally seeing the light on this "one issue"?

In the 1996 vice presidential debates, for example, Al Gore said of his opponent Jack Kemp: "Now I want to congratulate Mr. Kemp for being a lonely voice in the Republican Party over the years on this question" of racism and affirmative action. Kemp responded to this demagogic and baseless slander of the Republican Party by saying: "Affirmative action should be predicated upon need, not equality of reward, blah, blah, blah." Gee, thanks, Jack.

President Bush, too, has repeatedly set himself up as the test case of what happens when you try to play nice with a Democrat. After the dignified staff of the dignified former president trashed the White House on their dignified exit, Bush downplayed the property damage, saying: "There might have been a prank or two. Maybe somebody put a cartoon on the wall, but that's OK."

Anyone who knew anyone moving into the Bush White House knew that it was more than a "prank or two." But instead of stopping while they were ahead, pocketing Bush's gracefulness and moving on, the Democrats aggressively attacked Republicans for having falsely accused the Clinton staff of trashing the White House. They cited Bush's magnanimity as evidence that this was a lie. Rep. Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y., demanded an apology from the White House. USA Today ran a snippy article titled "Ex-Clinton staffers on vandalism: Got proof?" Former Clinton press secretary Jake Siewert insinuatingly asked why there were no records of the alleged damage.

And then the full GAO report came back: The Party of the People had done $15,000 worth of property damage to the People's House. Extend an olive branch to Democrats and they bite your hand off.

Bush has invited Sen. Teddy Kennedy to the White House for movie night (to watch the Kennedy hagiography "Thirteen Days"), brought him over to discuss education several times, named a federal building after one brother and gushingly praised the other.

The adulterous drunk who cheated at Harvard and killed a girl at Chappaquiddick responded to these overtures by attacking Bush. "It takes more than good intentions to make a difference," Kennedy said. Asked about Bush's intelligence (a meaningless concept in college admissions but a scientifically provable quality in the cases of Republican presidents and death-row inmates), Kennedy pointedly said only that he found Bush, "engaging and personable."

Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., dismissed Bush's overtures toward Kennedy as calculated political gamesmanship.

(Pop quiz: Did a Republican or Democrat say this about a member of the opposing party – "Your thoughtfulness truly amazes me. ... Thank you, my friend, for your many courtesies. If the world only knew." Answer: That was Sen. Trent Lott on Teddy Kennedy.)

When Bush named the Department of Justice building after Robert Kennedy, Kerry Kennedy Cuomo displayed the renowned Kennedy graciousness by viciously attacking the Bush administration at a pre-dedication ceremony. Noting that her daughter was in the audience, Kennedy Cuomo said: "Kara, if anyone tries to tell you this is the type of justice system your grandpa embraced, you just don't believe it."

This is as we have come to expect from a family of heroin addicts, statutory rapists, convicted and unconvicted female-killers, cheaters, bootleggers and dissolute drunks known as "Camelot." Why would anyone want such people as their "good friends"?

[Corin Stormhands]

Go Ann Go!

[davisfh]

I have to agree with Ann on this. These people are just plain "no good." As much as I like Sean Hannity I believe that he is wrong and misguided about this. Must have gotten caught up in the old "there's good in everyone" thing.

I'm here to tell you that there is not good in everyone. Some people are irretrievably evil and I believe that applies to most liberals. The liberals who are not irretrievably evil are the ones who are not very bright and could best be described as "suckers."

[SunStar]

Perplexingly, he writes: "The vast majority of liberals are good, sincere, well-meaning people." This cheery bonhomie is beginning to sound like the mantra about the "vast majority" of Muslims being peaceful and has produced the same good results. I think it's time to drop the infernal nonsense about liberals being well-intentioned but misguided. In the spirit of Hannityesque magnanimity, I will say that there is only one thing wrong with liberals: They're no good.

Ann Coulter is wrong on this one. The vast majority of liberals are the brainwashed masses, which are most definitely "good, sincere, well-meaning people". (You know, "sheeple", or "Clinton Kool-Aid Drinkers"... The morons who watch Peter Jennings and Dan Rather and regurgitate everything they say without thinking for themselves.)

However, Ann Coulter is right on the money that EVERY SINGLE liberal who is a true believer is EVIL and wants to change the USA into a socialist/communist nightmare. They are about 60% of the way to achieving their goal.

[the_doc]

I believe that Ann is one of the few conservatives who fully understands liberals.

[sanjacjake]

All your liberal stunts will soon be out in the elections
that they deem close..re: sENATE RACES primarily ..watch
for the "push polling" ...this can have devastating
results in a close race....media keeps public in dark
about the Dem. tactics....alert everyone as soon as one
is started....Jake.

[Texas_Jarhead]

Too sweet!

"Asked about Bush's intelligence (a meaningless concept in college admissions but a scientifically provable quality in the cases of Republican presidents and death-row inmates)..."

"This is as we have come to expect from a family of heroin addicts, statutory rapists, convicted and unconvicted female-killers, cheaters, bootleggers and dissolute drunks known as "Camelot." Why would anyone want such people as their "good friends"?"

LOL!

[TLBSHOW]

IT'S TIME TO TAKE OFF THE GLOVES.......


"If Republicans ever get really serious about politics, they can easily change the world!"


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/740650/posts

[LibWhacker]

Liberals-are-as-evil-as-Saddam-Hussein-and-Osama-bin-Laden-combined bump. Liberals-want-to-destroy-America-just-as-much-as-those-two-Arabic-bastards-do bump. And a DEFINITE Ann Coulter bump! God, I love that lady. Bumpity-Bump!

[the_doc]

Ann Coulter is wrong this one. The vast majority of liberals are the brainwashed masses, which are most definitely "good, sincere, well-meaning people".

I think you are too charitable. (And that was Ann's point about Hannity.)

[Revolting cat!]

Bravo! This woman is truly dangerous!

[the_doc]

Great link, thanks.

[borkrules]

I am in love with Ann. This is bracing, spot-on stuff.

Thanks.

[Mark Felton]

2-3 months ago I recall a Freeper coining the phrase "Battered Voter Syndrome" as a description of the reason why they tolerate so much abuse from the Republican party.

[MassMinuteman]

I love this woman!

[Lysander]

If only she would realize the same of Republicans. Well intentioned, wrong minded? Nope. Democrat lite.

[tonyinv]

I cant remember the last time a Republican politician took a cheap personal shot at a Democrat. She is dead right..they are all evil. As are all the activists.

I think the Democrats Hannity is talking about are those people who are only Democrats at the voting boot. We've all seen it, its not that the "sheeple" are stupid they are just ambivilant, they just dont care about this stuff. Its been said before, the minute an honest Democrat starts paying attention and caring, he/she stops being a Democrat.

[AnnaZ]

Great article, TLB. Thanks for posting it. Coulter says it like it is, as usual.

 

During the FRiva broadcast I interviewed featured speaker Rich Galen who also said "they" weren't evil, that they just saw the world differently. I wouldn't stand for it either.

 

As someone said, the brainwashed masses are well-meaning -- this is why lie-berals use emotion-based rhetoric to corral them. But the leaders of the movement are smug fascists progressively creating an increasingly docile herd.

[Blue Screen of Death]

I am really glad she is on my side. I would love to see a true debate between Ann and Hillary. Slice, dice and chill before serving.