Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP Places Bet on Louisiana [Senate] Race
Washington Times ^ | 8/28/02 | Ralph Z. Hallow

Posted on 08/28/2002 6:07:47 AM PDT by Coop

Edited on 07/12/2004 3:56:43 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

"Louisiana could well be the state that provides a Bush majority in the Senate," NRSC Executive Director Mitch Bainwol said in explaining why the Republican fund-raising committee decided to intervene in a Republican primary.

"I'm shocked," said state Sen. Tony Perkins, one of Mrs. Terrell's Republican primary rivals. Mr. Perkins says Mrs. Terrell is a centrist and that only a conservative like himself can win in the state.


(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: cooksey; landrieu; louisiana; perkins; senate; terrell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
The GOP obviously feels very strongly it can force a run-off. I think their chances are good as well. But I'm very disappointed that Gov. Foster chose to endorse Cooksey! If he makes the run-off against Landrieu, he'll get slaughtered. I guess the NRSC wants to make sure that Terrell gets the nod, not him.
1 posted on 08/28/2002 6:07:47 AM PDT by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Not giving up on LA yet. Even though Landrieu has about a 60% approval rating, there's obviously something in the polling numbers keeping the GOP's attention.
2 posted on 08/28/2002 6:09:41 AM PDT by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coop
I'll bet Frist just wants to make sure their is a Runoff. Probably could have done this better with a goe out the vote grasroots effort.
3 posted on 08/28/2002 6:15:06 AM PDT by CPT Clay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CPT Clay
Well, yes and no. The GOP realizes it has almost zero chance to win the Nov. election, so it does need to force a run-off to improve its chances to "slim." But if Cooksey is the #2 vote getter, then IMHO the run-off will be a complete waste of time. Terrell has got to make the run-off election in order to give the GOP a fighting chance and generate some national excitement.
4 posted on 08/28/2002 6:33:19 AM PDT by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Coop
I think there are so many other races that are more competitive that this move by the NRSC is dumb. I hope the NRSC has some solid polling to back this up.
5 posted on 08/28/2002 6:56:44 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
What's dumb about it? Landrieu polled at 46% before any resources were put towards Terrell's campaign. All they need to do is force a run-off. Then all attention can be turned to LA in mid Nov thru Dec. Heck, I applaud them for trying several alternatives, instead of throwing their hands up at poor polling numbers.

And, as I said before, their numbers are obviously showing some kind of weakness in Landrieu's support. But I still view this race as a longshot.

6 posted on 08/28/2002 7:04:24 AM PDT by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CPT Clay; GraniteStateConservative
I just realized I messed up and somehow chopped off the introductory paragraph, with more details:

The National Republican Senatorial Committee, in a highly unusual move, has decided to commit nearly a half-million dollars to buy television advertising for Suzanne Haik Terrell, one of three Republican Senate primary candidates in Louisiana.

7 posted on 08/28/2002 7:07:10 AM PDT by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: Coop
"This changes the dynamics of the race," Mr. Perkins said. "Until now, it has been a love fest on the Republican side. We've stayed focused on Landrieu as the enemy. Now my campaign is finding another aggressor — the NRSC."

This is the reason I stopped giving to the NRSC. They seem to always support the more liberal Republican in primary races.

9 posted on 08/28/2002 7:18:19 AM PDT by sultan88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sultan88
That's unfortunately been a noticeable trend this election cycle, between the NRSC and the White House. I can actually forgive them in this case, however. I was not at all pleased with the meddling in CA or TN.
10 posted on 08/28/2002 7:21:11 AM PDT by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative; Coop
Here is the data that they are apparently basing the decision on........

Landrieu runoff?

Advocate staff report
Could Louisiana's Republican U.S. Senate candidates force Democratic U.S. Sen. Mary Landrieu into a runoff election in Nov. 5 balloting?

There's a "strong probability" that could happen based on a poll released Saturday by the National Republican Senatorial Committee, spokesman Dan Allen said.

Republicans think they have a chance of defeating Landrieu in a December runoff.

In the telephone survey of 500 registered voters, Landrieu's favorable rating stood at 53 percent while her unfavorable registered 35 percent.

Landrieu is also held under 50 percent in a four-way race with Republican contenders U.S. Rep. John Cooksey of Monroe, state Rep. Tony Perkins of Pride and state Elections Commissioner Suzanne Terrell.

When those surveyed were asked who they would vote for if the election were held today, Landrieu got 46 percent; Cooksey, 13 percent; Terrell, 10 percent; and Perkins, 6 percent.

Twenty-five percent of those surveyed wouldn't say or didn't know.

In head-to-head matchups, Landrieu barely went more than 50 percent against each of the three Republicans. Against Cooksey, Landrieu had 52 percent of the vote to Cooksey's 37 percent; Terrell, 51 percent to 38 percent; and Perkins 53 percent to 35 percent.

The survey, conducted July 29-30 by Voter Consumer Research, has a 4.5 percent plus or minus margin of error.

When it came to re-election, 41 percents said Landrieu deserves re-election and 49 percent said someone else should be given a chance.

When it came to Landrieu's voting records, 45 percent said she voted the way the national Democratic Party wants while 38 percent said she voted for Louisiana's values.

And on the question of whether Louisiana voters want someone to help President Bush or provide a check on him -- 45 percent of the respondents said help the president and 37 percent said to keep a check on him.

"After looking at these numbers and seeing Mary Landrieu's record, we see a strong potential for a runoff with our Republican candidates running against her," said Allen.

The bottom line analysis by the Republican committee: "Her numbers are weak."

Landrieu's campaign response:

"We don't believe it," said Landrieu spokesman Rich Masters. "We are still feeling good about this race."

"We have not seen anything that shows her in these dire straits."

Masters noted that the polling was done when Republicans were running television ads "distorting" and "lying about" Landrieu's record.

Landrieu is now on the air with ads of her own "setting the record straight."

Mixing it up

The National Republican Senatorial Committee poll is the second U.S. Senate poll released by Republican pollsters in recent days.

A poll done for GOP challenger U.S. Rep. John Cooksey shows incumbent Democratic U.S. Sen. Mary Landrieu could also find herself in a runoff if she picks up certain Democratic opposition.

The telephone poll, by Arlington, Va.-based pollster David Winston, asked voters last month who they would vote for if the U.S. Senate race was held that day?

The poll put Landrieu and three announced Republican candidates -- Cooksey, state Rep. Tony Perkins and Elections Commissioner Suzanne Terrell in the field.

But the poll also threw in potential black Democratic contenders. One round included state Sen. Cleo Fields -- who has since said he won't make the race. In another, Raymond Brown, a New Orleans minister who says he's running, took Fields' place.

With either Fields or Brown in the line-up, Landrieu fell below 50 percent, said Winston.

"This is the first survey I've seen where she was likely to find herself in a runoff," said Winston.

With Fields in the race, Landrieu got 42 percent of the respondents' votes. With Brown in the race, she got 46 percent.

"The element here is it's not merely that she's under 50. There has to be work done positively to get her back over it and that's hard for an incumbent," said Winston.

In both lineups, Cooksey came in second in the mid-teens (14 percent with Fields and 16 percent with Brown). Terrell and Perkins approached double digits (9 percent and 8 percent, respectively). Fields garnered 11 percent and Brown 5 percent.

In both lineups, 16 percent of respondents said they were undecided.

"Let me not diminish the task on the Republican side," said Winston, who has done polling work for the U.S. House Republican Conference.

"The survey showed an opportunity that people didn't think was there, but there is a lot of work to be done too."

The poll, conducted July 9-10, involved 400 registered voters. There's a 4.9 percent plus or minus margin of error.

Cain not running

It's no secret that state Sen. James David Cain is interested in seeking statewide elected office.

But U.S. Senate?

Cain, a Democrat from Dry Creek, said he's had some legislators -- both black and white -- approach him about a run.

Running for U.S. Senate against incumbent Democrat Mary Landrieu "really wasn't my agenda," Cain said last week.

"I do think Mary has some problems or they wouldn't be asking people like me to consider running," said Cain.

"People just don't think they have a candidate they feel comfortable with of all the candidates."

Cain said he thinks people are approaching him because he's raising his statewide profile by traveling the state opposing a sales-income tax swap plan that goes before voters Nov. 5.


11 posted on 08/28/2002 7:45:02 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Coop
I'll give you all a little lesson on Louisiana politics.

  1. North and South Louisiana are two different countries.
  2. North Louisiana has a much smaller population than South Louisiana.
  3. North Louisiana tends to vote Republican (with exceptions), South Louisiana ALWAYS votes Dem.
  4. If you have a regular ol' American type name like, say, "Terrell," AND you are Republican, you have no chance whatsoever against a Democrat who last name ends with "-rieu" or "-reaux."

I hate to say it, but, as a resident of North Louisiana, the folks south of Alexandria will not vote for anyone whose last name does not end with "-rieu" or "-reaux," UNLESS he/she is a Democrat with solid cajun credentials (a la Edwin "The only way I can lose this election is to be caught with a dead girl or live boy" Edwards).

If the RNC is hanging its hat on this election, things don't look good for November.

12 posted on 08/28/2002 7:57:42 AM PDT by Skooz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sultan88
Amen, brother. This is why I quit giving to the R.P., completely.
13 posted on 08/28/2002 8:01:40 AM PDT by Nephi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Skooz
Thanks for the education. Allow me to return the favor.

1) The GOP ain't hanging its hat on this election.
2) Landrieu's last name helped her pull a whopping 50.2% of the vote last election. Whoopee.

14 posted on 08/28/2002 8:02:00 AM PDT by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: deport; GraniteStateConservative
Good stuff! Thanks a lot. I had seen a little of this data, but not all of it. Here's the key point getting the GOP's juices flowing (IMHO):

When it came to re-election, 41 percent said Landrieu deserves re-election and 49 percent said someone else should be given a chance.

I also didn't realize Landrieu was now struggling to stay above 50% when matched against any of the three GOP candidates. Things are looking up. It should be noted, however, that VCR is a GOP polling firm.

15 posted on 08/28/2002 8:04:35 AM PDT by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Coop
1) The GOP ain't hanging its hat on this election.

Glad to hear it, cause it ain't gonna happen.

2) Landrieu's last name helped her pull a whopping 50.2% of the vote last election. Whoopee.

That is with virtually all of North Louisiana voting for Woody Jenkins. The folks south of Alexandria voted for Landrieu. They will this time, as well.

16 posted on 08/28/2002 8:07:47 AM PDT by Skooz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Coop
It's not even 50.2% if all the N'Orleans ghetto fraud votes are removed. It should be Woody Jenkins running for re-election (and winning handily) this year, not little Miss Brown-Roots.

If this election somehow does advance to a runoff (hardly a certainty unless another Rat gets in the race), don't for a minute think that Massive Democratic Vote Fraud © will not once again rear its head.

DWG

17 posted on 08/28/2002 8:08:35 AM PDT by DownWithGreenspan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Skooz
Glad to hear it, cause it ain't gonna happen.

Of course not. Just like Forrester is not going to win in NJ, Ehrlich is not going to win in MD, Simon is not going to win in CA, Monteith is not going to win in Condit's district... Blah, blah, blah.

Pssssttt. You want to impress somebody? Try going betting against the favorites, not on them. Otherwise your pessimism is simply a waste of time. You don't have any more of a clue as to what will occur this November than I do.

18 posted on 08/28/2002 8:20:04 AM PDT by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Coop
I appreciate your optimism, and I hope I am wrong. I have lived in Louisiana since 1971 and have seen a trend unbroken since then. Maybe it will be different this time, who knows. Anything can happen.

Maybe I am jaded by living here so long and seeing the same thing happen every election.

19 posted on 08/28/2002 8:27:42 AM PDT by Skooz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Coop
Does anyone know what the success rate of the NRSC when backing candidates against incumbents?
20 posted on 08/28/2002 8:37:09 AM PDT by A2J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson