How about breaking the terms of the cease-fire agreement he signed in '91 vis a vis the arms inspectors? How about his weekly attacks on US and NATO aircraft patrolling the 'no-fly' zones also established by the afore-mentioned agreement?
And surely you don't think an individual as infamous as Abu Nidal lived in Baghdad without his knowledge and therefore his acquiescence do you?
How about breaking the terms of the cease-fire agreement he signed in '91 vis a vis the arms inspectors? How about his weekly attacks on US and NATO aircraft patrolling the 'no-fly' zones also established by the afore-mentioned agreement? Invasion because of non-compliance with UN resolutions. Right...
We have a remedy for the weekly attacks -- an armed response.
And surely you don't think an individual as infamous as Abu Nidal lived in Baghdad without his knowledge and therefore his acquiescence do you?
This is NOT a sufficient justification for an invasion.