Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HumanaeVitae
I know this is asking a lot, but use your head.
Do you think, after the last set of tests failing
to make the shroud old enough, that the
Vatican secretly picked this new testing lab
for its objectivity?
20 posted on 08/21/2002 8:47:11 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: gcruse
No.

You use your head. The Shroud was "dated" by a bunch of atheists at 1130-1290. Ok. Fine. Please explain how a bunch of medieval bufoons produced a photonegative image on a piece of cloth, an image that they couldn't even see let alone verify for its accuracy, seven centuries before the invention of the camera.

21 posted on 08/21/2002 8:51:41 PM PDT by HumanaeVitae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: gcruse
The cardinal said the research involved removing impurities and residue from the cloth, which is 13 feet long and three feet wide.

I doubt the Church is "hand-picking" to get certain results. They would have to know that would undermine all their credibility concerning The Shroud.

Me? I'm a believer.

54 posted on 08/21/2002 10:08:22 PM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson