1 posted on
08/18/2002 4:28:56 PM PDT by
USA21
To: USA21
bump
2 posted on
08/18/2002 4:52:03 PM PDT by
Red Jones
To: USA21
On the other hand, there are lots of conspiracies.
3 posted on
08/18/2002 4:52:29 PM PDT by
gcruse
To: USA21
Awesome Read.
More information on the Mysterious Deaths mentioned above can be found at the Alamo Girl Website. HERE.
4 posted on
08/18/2002 4:53:32 PM PDT by
vannrox
To: backhoe; snopercod; joanie-f; brityank; JeanS; USA21
What are the odds that the authoress of this article, will use the same sources on probability theory, randomness, chance patterns in noise, and such ... to argue against the "junk science" output of the environmentalists who unashamedly find cataclysmic connections between events in nature, which strangely parallel with their political ambitions; both "bodies of knowledge" discovered in the noise of their very own echo-chamber?
Who --- that echo-chamber ensemble of environmentalists --- by the way, have no similar "environmental impact statement" such as the "bizarre circumstances" of the bio-professionals in the above story?
Not to mention: You may wonder what other groups of scientifica there are ... and how they have fared lately --- the "double-blind" thing and all?
Yet of course, there are the dozens of people around Bill Clinton who dropped like flies; they are no doubt the chance measuring stick with which to mark off the others.
To: USA21
It is absolutely true that we have an instinctive urge to find patterns. One need only look to the skies on a dark night to notice the constellations.
These constellations are unique to earth. If you were viewing the skies from a planet orbiting Betelgeuse in the Orion constellation, you would see entire different constellations, even if you were looking at the same stars as here on earth.
Interesting article.
7 posted on
08/18/2002 5:25:14 PM PDT by
Dog Gone
To: USA21
I thought that number was now 14? How many world class bio-scientists are there that 14 is random?
8 posted on
08/18/2002 5:26:18 PM PDT by
brat
To: USA21
terrorists could have pulled this off, or someone hired by terrorists. shrugging something like this off reminds me of the intel community shrugging off info known about al-queda before 9/11.
10 posted on
08/18/2002 5:44:54 PM PDT by
sonofron
To: Fred Mertz
ping
12 posted on
08/18/2002 6:18:12 PM PDT by
weikel
To: USA21
the first paragraphs are a contradiction. that the second series may be random does not mean that the first one is. Puh-leez. Junk science. Or was he just kidding? I didn't bother to read past that part.
18 posted on
08/18/2002 7:12:15 PM PDT by
ASDFGHJK
To: Purdue Pete
ping
21 posted on
08/18/2002 9:11:21 PM PDT by
lucyblue
To: USA21
To: USA21
I think people are more afraid of conspiracies than gaps in the truth. Which is why they would want to believe what this article says , it makes them feel more comfortable.
Life is full of conspiracies and the people involved , don't want them known.
Anything from a simple business deal to the setting up of a government official to displace them or the murder of an enemy.
More than a tendency to falsely fill in the blanks to make themselves comfortable , people stick their heads in the sand so they don't have to deal with it.
26 posted on
08/19/2002 5:01:50 AM PDT by
Eustace
To: USA21
31 posted on
06/01/2004 10:12:02 PM PDT by
First_Salute
(May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson