[BCrago66]

Notice how Rush get his editorials in the Washington Post and now the Wall Street Journal.

There's just one crappy left-wing paper located near Times Square that refuses to publish him.

[Selara]

ping

In my latest post to you on other thread, I said that the Iraq question revolved more around the threat of WMD than on a 9/11 tie in. Looks like there will be a tie in.

I suppose there is no way of knowing what Atta said to that Iraqi that April day, but since he left the next day, it most likely was not just a friendly visit.

We are in the rhetoric stage. Will be most interesting see this unfold.

[quidnunc]

Another Mark Levin-authored article published under Rush Limbaugh's byline.

[Looking for Diogenes]

Of course, if Congress decides it doesn't want a war with Iraq, it can step in. It controls the power of the purse, and it can cut off funding for military operations against Iraq. For this reason, Mr. Bush would be wise to consult with Congress, as I'm sure he is. But he need not defer to it.

The 9/14/01 resolution seems to satisfy the War Powers Act. The WPA does allow Congress to pass another joint resolution calling for the removal of troops, which would not be subject to presidential veto. There is concern that this provision is constitutional. A congressional budget approriation which cut off funding could be vetoed by the President.