Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Backlash (against feminism) Picks Up Speed
DA-DI ^ | FR post 8-11-2 | by Mona Charen

Posted on 08/12/2002 2:55:37 PM PDT by vannrox

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: vannrox
What I find so ironic about feminism and their rabid support of abortion, etc. is that most of them are lesbos and don't sleep with men. Notice this is never, ever brought up? They don't have to make that "choice." When will they ever get pregnant? So much for their regard for straight women and our rights. It's obvious they hate us and want to kill our kids.
21 posted on 08/12/2002 8:00:25 PM PDT by pray4liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Shalit sees through the cant and pretension of this arrangement. She notes that a man does not sit by the phone pining for a call from a woman just because he has been sexually intimate with her. Men are not vulnerable in this way.

But one example of gross over generailizations in this piece. She simply has no authority to make such a sweeping claim. In fact I know men who agonize over being casually dumped. She is just wrong. Furthermore, women were not sold short by "feminism". They and men were (and are) sold short by commercialism ... and in more areas than just sex. There are always people who follow the herd. In today's media saturated world, is it any wonder that we see more and more people relying on media to set their standards of conduct, sexual and otherwise?

First of all, it is more than dishonest to suggest the sum total of "feminism" was the so-called "sexual revolution". Also, both authors exerpted comments assume women aren't smart enough to set their own course, are too gullible to be able to weigh the pros and cons of what they are being fed by the culture (and media). Well guess what? Many aren't, but neither are men. Women are not unique in being led along.

A certain percentage of the population (men and women) are always gullible enough to be led along by the whims of fashion and whatever the socio/political proponents of the day promote. For good and ill, this is a marketers dream come true, whether peddling products or ideas.

22 posted on 08/19/2002 10:27:39 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
The feminist prescription for happiness is precisely wrong at every stage of life, Crittenden contends. The modern combination of sexual libertinism and late marriage conspires, she argues, to deny women what they most want and need -- a stable marriage to a faithful husband who will not abandon them or their children. If young women withheld sex, young men would be far more inclined to marry in their 20s, Crittenden observes, an age at which women are at the peak of their allure and their fertility. These days, millions of women waste their 20s in a series of fruitless "relationships" with men who decline to "commit." After turning the corner of 30 or 35, when beauty and fertility are declining, desperation often sets in. Panic is only exacerbated, Crittenden reminds us, by the presence of a new crop of 20-somethings providing free sex.

Skipping over that what she proposes is the "feminist prescription for happiness" is a flat out lie ....... this is SO INSULTING. This women's worth as only her "allure and fertility" and her ability to parcel out sex at height of them both to "buy" what she "really wants" (which Crittendon claims to know). Furthermore the "women as prostitutes" approach to describing women as using sex to get something else is insulting to the Nth degree. Plus it negates the fact that some women enjoy sex for its own sake, not for its "purchasing power". (Damn she's insulting).

And again, she is working from the premise that women are so stupid they don't really know what they want nor how to get it .... so SHE has to tell them. Bah! Every bit as insulting as what she claims feminists did ... make prescriptions for happiness! You know what? Most people figure out for themselves how to be happy and live their own lives. We don't need no stinking nanny (of any stripe) telling us what to do and when to do it.

23 posted on 08/19/2002 10:40:11 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pray4liberty
Most feminists are not lesbians. In addition SOME feminists are pro-Life. http://feministsforlife.com/

In actuality it is straight feminists who promote abortion the most. You're blaming the wrong groups.
24 posted on 08/19/2002 10:42:53 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Interesting article. Yet, I'm always intrigued by the concept that the main way to oppose feminism is to put women back into the home.

I would say that the main way to oppose feminism is to put men back in the home.

25 posted on 10/20/2002 8:07:49 PM PDT by Z in Oregon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson