CNN is gonna have a field day with this
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: My Favorite Headache
I think this is all wonderful news!!!!
2 posted on
08/05/2002 1:57:59 PM PDT by
OldFriend
To: My Favorite Headache
produced a seismic shift in federal spending, moving tens of billions of dollars from Democratic to GOP districts, yeah, so?
To: My Favorite Headache
I have to agree--this is terrific news. Do I have a problem with this? No. Should Republicans apologize? HELL no. ;-D
To: My Favorite Headache
To: My Favorite Headache
I've got an idea. Let's spend NONE in Democrat districts for awhile. It'll still be a generation before we catch up, and maybe longer if Robert Byrd doesn't croak soon.
7 posted on
08/05/2002 2:02:25 PM PDT by
Dog Gone
To: My Favorite Headache
Funny thing about omelets - turn them over and they brown on the other side
9 posted on
08/05/2002 2:04:49 PM PDT by
SEGUET
To: My Favorite Headache
The Headline should read - For years the Democrats made sure that the governments spending was in areas that voted for them. This monopoly of federal funds was broken up in 1994.
To: My Favorite Headache
I can't imagine that this amounts to a drop in the bucket compared to the trillions spent on welfare in the inner cities which are Demoncrap areas. Reality check, AP?
To: My Favorite Headache
I love the AP's title -- makes it sound like money-laundering or Enronesque fuzzy math.
13 posted on
08/05/2002 2:15:42 PM PDT by
Sloth
To: My Favorite Headache
Myrthil, 38, of Brockton, Mass., is one of thousands of legal immigrants who don't qualify for food stamps because of changes Congress made in 1997. He can obtain food stamps only for his 3-month-old baby, who automatically became a U.S. citizen when she was born stateside. ``I have family, four brothers over here, a sister, when I need some food they can give me some food,'' he said. Imagine that -- people choosing to provide for their own families, instead of forcing taxpayers to do it. What a novel idea.
14 posted on
08/05/2002 2:19:02 PM PDT by
Sloth
To: My Favorite Headache
When Democrats last controlled the House and wrote the 1995 budget, the average Democratic district got $35 million more than the average GOP district. By 2001, average federal spending in Republican districts was $612 million more than in Democratic districts. This is a great example of Media Bias. The figures are for the average Democrat distirct compared to all Republican distircts. The average Republican district advantage works out to less than $3 million. In other words, the Democrats abused the system more than 10 times as much as the Republicans - $35 to $3 million per district.
The numbers also fail to account for inflation. With inflation, the Democrats were far more abusive than the 10 to 1 ratio.
To: My Favorite Headache
So what?! Congresspeople always steer money to their districts. More GOP Congresspeople = more money in GOP districts... What's the news here?? Unless they figure out a way to do away with pork, this is par for the course. Anyhow, the GOP areas probably needed equalized funding after being deprived for so many years by the Dem congresses.
16 posted on
08/05/2002 2:24:42 PM PDT by
AntiGuv
To: My Favorite Headache
$612 million more in federal spending last year for congressional districts represented by Republicans than for those represented by Democrats Washington sneezes bigger than this.
To: Coop
Looks like the presstitutes don't care for the generic polls. ;^)
20 posted on
08/05/2002 2:30:54 PM PDT by
eureka!
To: My Favorite Headache
These are the areas that have the bulk of those who actually produce something for this nation. They should get the lion's share of revenues back from DC.
22 posted on
08/05/2002 2:36:41 PM PDT by
My2Cents
To: My Favorite Headache
CNN is gonna have a field day with this
Why of course dont you know there the most credible news source on the globe! [laughing so hard my stomach hurts ]
....../sarcasm kept on due to temporary insanity and lack of duct tape /
To: My Favorite Headache
This sort of makes sense since, under the Republicans, the moneys are pretty much being returned to where they're being taken from, right?
25 posted on
08/05/2002 2:39:36 PM PDT by
xrp
To: My Favorite Headache
So, the millions of dollars in Federal gifts David Bonior (D-Mich) got for St. Clair Shores is for
a poor urban district?
Hmmm... I'm sure the voters in Macomb County would love to know they are part of a poor urban area...
26 posted on
08/05/2002 2:41:55 PM PDT by
DrDavid
To: My Favorite Headache
This is breaking news?
"In terms of services, for example, that translates into more business loans and farm subsidies, and fewer public housing grants and food stamps."
So the GOP shifted spending from the less-productive to the more-productive sectors.
That's to be applauded, not condemned.
27 posted on
08/05/2002 2:45:49 PM PDT by
Redbob
To: My Favorite Headache
This is good news and should cause every person in Michigan to vote for the GOP. We are tired of sending all of our dollars to support Detroit. Just let it die and be done with it.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson