Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US accused of airstrike cover-up (U.N. report)
The Times (U.K.) ^ | 07/29/2002 | Dumeetha Luthra

Posted on 07/28/2002 5:22:46 PM PDT by Pokey78

AMERICAN forces may have breached human rights and then removed evidence after the so-called wedding party airstrike that killed more than 50 Afghan civilians this month, according to a draft United Nations report seen by The Times.

A preliminary UN investigation has found no corroboration of American claims that its aircraft were fired on from the ground, and says there were discrepancies in US accounts of what happened.

If the findings are upheld by a second, more detailed, UN investigation, they will cause huge embarrassment to the Pentagon.

UN sources said that the findings pointed to an American cover-up, and suggested that American investigators were dragging their feet hoping that the issue would pass.

The attack took place early on July 1 as American forces hunted pockets of Taleban and al-Qaeda resistance. A US helicopter gunship opened fire on targets around the village of Kakarak, and the casualties included 25 members of one family at a wedding party.

A UN source said that the report was produced by a team of “experienced and reputable UN people, who have been in the region a while and know it well”. It states that there was clear evidence that human rights violations had taken place and that coalition forces had arrived on the scene very quickly after the airstrikes and “cleaned the area”, removing evidence of “shrapnel, bullets and traces of blood”. Women on the scene had their hands tied behind their backs.

Investigators had found no weapons, “no corroboration” on the ground that the US had been fired on, and that there were discrepancies between the various American accounts of what happened.

In a prepared statement last night a UN spokesman in Afghanistan said that the report contained judgments that were not sufficiently substantiated, and that a comprehensive report was being finalised that would provide a more detailed and accurate picture.

However, the statement added that “the findings on the ground bear out the paramount necessity that such incidents do not recur, both from a humanitarian and political perspective”.

It called for “an in-depth investigation (to) be carried out to ensure that such tragedies are not repeated; and that the protection of civilian lives becomes a primary concern in the fight against terrorism in Afghanistan”.

The wedding party raid was not the first US airstrike to kill Afghan civilians and it both angered President Karzai and has fuelled anti-American sentiment in the country.

A joint US-Afghan team is investigating the strike, but nothing has been disclosed and no timescale has been given on when the findings will be made public. One UN official put it: “The more it drags on, the harder it is to prove and probably the people investigating want it to go slowly and die away.”

Pentagon officials have said that cameras fixed to the AC130’s gun turrets showed gunfire coming from the ground, but the Pentagon has not released the film, as it has on previous occasions, preventing independent analysis of whether it was anti-aircraft artillery or celebratory rifle fire.

The Pentagon declined to comment on the UN report, but said all matters arising from the incident were under consideration by US Central Command and that charges against the servicemen involved had not been ruled out.

But the Pentagon insisted it was too early for the US to draw any conclusions because its investigative team had yet to start compiling its report.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: southasialist; unlist; warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
Now you know why we (the U.S.) want no part of the International Criminal Court. They (led by France) would be beating down the doors to prosecute our guys.
1 posted on 07/28/2002 5:22:47 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Bomb The Hague.
2 posted on 07/28/2002 5:23:37 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Now you know why we (the U.S.) want no part of the International Criminal Court. They (led by France) would be beating down the doors to prosecute our guys.

Yup. Exactly.

3 posted on 07/28/2002 5:29:00 PM PDT by FourPeas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
preliminary UN investigation has found no corroboration of American claims that its aircraft were fired on from the ground

Where would they go for "corroboration"? Let's get out of the UN, and let's remember never again to protect the bums in Europe...

4 posted on 07/28/2002 5:29:46 PM PDT by EaglesUpForever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
"If the findings are upheld by a second, more detailed, UN investigation, they will cause huge embarrassment to the Pentagon."

HA....WAR is HELL......

5 posted on 07/28/2002 5:32:32 PM PDT by goodnesswins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Doesn't Syria now head the security council????
NeverGore
6 posted on 07/28/2002 5:33:47 PM PDT by nevergore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Rummy said we were fired on and I think he knows what is going on better than they do.
7 posted on 07/28/2002 5:36:24 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalebert
Rummy said we were fired on and I think he knows what is going on better than they do.

Agreed.

8 posted on 07/28/2002 5:43:15 PM PDT by b4its2late
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
What also matter is what the average Afghan warlord has heard and believes.
9 posted on 07/28/2002 5:43:40 PM PDT by Lessismore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nevergore
Doesn't Syria now head the security council????

I think it was only for a month, and it may have been June or it might be for this month. Not sure.

10 posted on 07/28/2002 5:44:13 PM PDT by b4its2late
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
give us what we want and we'll go away
11 posted on 07/28/2002 5:50:42 PM PDT by linn37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Time the U.S. said adios,au revoir,arrivederci,adeus,Auf Wiedersehen to the u.n..
12 posted on 07/28/2002 5:55:57 PM PDT by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
Bomb The Hague.

Yes! And then the UN building. Then bulldoze it. Then cover it up!!

13 posted on 07/28/2002 5:59:11 PM PDT by Cachelot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
A UN source said that the report was produced by a team of “experienced and reputable UN people, who have been in the region a while and know it well”.

"Reputable UN people" is an oxymoron.

14 posted on 07/28/2002 6:01:49 PM PDT by Numbers Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
It seems strange that UN inspectors are over there. I thought this was our war. Did we invite them in? If so, we have only ourselves to blame for any reports they may make.
15 posted on 07/28/2002 6:04:33 PM PDT by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I wish that we would get out of the U.N.
16 posted on 07/28/2002 6:14:55 PM PDT by arly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
The only thing I can offer the U.N. is a conspicuous middle finger.
17 posted on 07/28/2002 6:19:33 PM PDT by grimalkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

18 posted on 07/28/2002 6:23:59 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
And can't you see Syria, as a member of the UN Security Council leading the charge on the International Court.
19 posted on 07/28/2002 6:26:04 PM PDT by Napoleon Solo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Numbers Guy
i believe "un-people" is so appropriate for the u.n.... they put nations before individuals and the us should be rid of them...
20 posted on 07/28/2002 6:28:20 PM PDT by teeman8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson