1 posted on
07/28/2002 4:12:04 AM PDT by
2Trievers
To: 2Trievers
The one thing that would put the USPS in the black is charging .37¢ for each piece
of junk mail, that nobody wants anyway. That would either raise their ;revenue
tremendously or cut there expenses tremendously.
2 posted on
07/28/2002 4:53:13 AM PDT by
chainsaw
To: 2Trievers
What? You mean there is not an alternative to first class mail now? Damn, and I thought the internet and computers would change everything. Too bad the USPS doesn't have a demorat President, Congress and Senate to work with. Then they could be charging us and our ISP's for everything we do.
To: 2Trievers
And guess what?
Nothing at all will happen. Chauffer driven cars will continue. Approval for outrageous expenses will continue. Waste, fraud and abuse will continue.
And in 18 months, we'll get another rate increase. Bet on it.
7 posted on
07/28/2002 5:23:53 AM PDT by
Guillermo
To: 2Trievers
bump
To: 2Trievers
It lost $1.7 billion last year...According to the Dallas Morning News, however, the Postal Service has committed $25 million to the team "for a three-year contract that expires in 2004."
Lance Armstrong has done more to offset the often negative (and often deserved) stereotype of the USPS, which is a 'quasi-independent' corporation. He probably wouldn't be complaining if they'd spent five times that on advertizing, which they probably do with less effect.
Why is everyone picking on Armstrong?
Anyway that is only $8.3 million per year. As for their loss, it's less than 1/200th of the total. They can find better places to cut.
To: 2Trievers
To improve the Post Office, let's have Congress micromanage it.
11 posted on
07/28/2002 6:41:23 AM PDT by
Drango
To: 2Trievers
The point the author doesn't make is that the USPS does its sponsorship of a sporting event that is in A FOREIGN COUNTRY!!!
How many Frenchmen use the USPS regularly?
To: 2Trievers
USPS picks the right horse.... looks like Lance Armstrong will win a 4th Tour De France!!! I'd say we're getting our money's worth. GO LANCE GO!!! :)
To: 2Trievers
This is clearly a corporate scandal. We need to go after the houses of those at the top.
22 posted on
07/28/2002 9:28:11 AM PDT by
phalynx
To: 2Trievers
>David Plotz of Slate magazine tried to find out, but he was told by Postal Service spokeswoman Monica Hand that this was "proprietary information."
Competing postal delivery companies might use that financial data to give themselves a business advantage.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson