Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Hmmm! 1994! Joey Lie-ber-man!

Whose legacy????

1 posted on 07/24/2002 7:18:22 AM PDT by aShepard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: aShepard
Lieberman - the unconscious of the senate.
2 posted on 07/24/2002 7:22:03 AM PDT by b4its2late
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aShepard
Words from the acknowledged Master of Markets.
3 posted on 07/24/2002 7:22:29 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Vic3O3
The Oracle of Omaha speaks.!

Semper Fi!
4 posted on 07/24/2002 7:26:59 AM PDT by dd5339
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aShepard
WARREN E. BUFFETT strikes me as a lefty, to boot. Wasn't he the one who was saying that he didn't need a tax cut?
7 posted on 07/24/2002 7:35:38 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aShepard
I'm surprised the Clymers ran this. Lieberman is a fraudulent poseur and I do hope the truth is outed, big time...
8 posted on 07/24/2002 7:35:58 AM PDT by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aShepard
He's absolutely right, this is just commonsense. If the CEO's are saying the options have no value, then they should have no problem giving them up. If they do have value, they should be expensed.
9 posted on 07/24/2002 7:37:40 AM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aShepard
Lieberman pretends to be a moderate Democrat with conservative social principles. But he's just like the rest. Remember when he suddenly was in favor of partial-birth abortion, and was suddenly against vouchers during the Presidential campaign? He dropped his principles like a live grenade when it suited him.
11 posted on 07/24/2002 7:38:28 AM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aShepard
Funny, the media is unaware of Lieberman's legislation.
12 posted on 07/24/2002 7:41:00 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aShepard
So Buffet doesn't talk about his support for the death tax.

He got his and he doesn't want anybody elese to have it, but the slime called the federali's.

19 posted on 07/24/2002 8:24:38 AM PDT by dts32041
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aShepard
Pension fund income? The administration declared the budget
deficit this year as $165 Billion. If you take out social security
surplus (where is that darn lock-box) the deficit is $400 Billion.
23 posted on 07/24/2002 8:32:14 AM PDT by BlackJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aShepard
It was Sens."Loserman" and the "other piece of bread"in the Teddy"The Swimmer"Kennedy cocktail-waitress SANDWICH,Chris Dodd who led the way in relaxing accounting-standards!!!!!!!Also,it was "BeelzeBubba's"SEC head(Arthur Levitt)who neglected to review ENRON filings between 1997-2000!!!
24 posted on 07/24/2002 8:36:10 AM PDT by bandleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aShepard
Oh my!!

Warren Buffett--usually a social liberal--has suddenly gotten a clue and figured out why the market is tanking--too many clueless Democrats in Congress! (faints)

Given Buffett's enormous influence in the stock market, he might just lead the charge to clean up the mess. Maybe he's figured out what a bunch of scoundrels the Clintons really are? =)

27 posted on 07/24/2002 8:43:52 AM PDT by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aShepard
Unfortunately, current S.E.C. leadership seems uninterested in correcting this matter.

While it's heartening to hear Buffett name names (in regard to Lieberman),
I'm wondering if Pitt (the current S.E.C. head?) shouldn't be thown overboard.
I heard on the radio news today that Pitt was asking to be made a Cabinet-level official...
and The White House said this request/demand was "a distraction".

Maybe Pitt isn't (at least in terms of politicall appearance) the guy that Dubya
needs at this time.

(Just my amateur opinion; I'd been fairly in favor of Pitt as he said his past
experiences told him "where the bodies" are buried. Maybe he let his ego expand more
than his drive to actually take care of bidness.)
33 posted on 07/24/2002 9:37:52 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aShepard
I always love a chance to use this oldie:

Joe Lieberman, Transformations

Funny that we've been discussing Lieberman and Dodd's complicity from the accounting side on FR for (many) months, but it takes Warren Buffett to get it mentioned in the NY Times.

35 posted on 07/24/2002 10:08:43 AM PDT by Fixit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aShepard
The one person who derived the most benefits was the Sinkmaster himself. A phony president -- a phony economy. As long as people felt content and they (erroneously) thought everything was fine and they were making money, a rapist and traitor would not be removed from the White House. IT'S THE ECONOMY, STUPID were the four most dangerous words of the 1990s. They kept him in office and did immeasurable damage to this nation.
38 posted on 07/24/2002 10:57:32 AM PDT by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aShepard
Indeed, actions by Congress and the Securities and Exchange Commission have the potential of creating a smoke screen that will prevent real accounting reform. The Senate itself is the major reason corporations have been able to duck option expensing. On May 3, 1994, the Senate, led by Senator Joseph Lieberman, pushed the Financial Accounting Standards Board and Arthur Levitt, then chairman of the S.E.C., into backing down from mandating that options be expensed.

Mr. Levitt has said that he regrets this retreat more than any other move he made during his tenure as chairman.

IT seems to me it is time to bring some members of the SENATE before some committee investigating FRAUD to explain their reasons for such a vote!!!

(BTW--Hey JOEY LIEBERMAN...how are things going with CITI-GROUP banking, babes? Ya gonna talk about your cozy relationship with Enron's enabler anytime soon? We wait with baited breath for one ounce of honesty and integrity to escape your trembling lips!!)

39 posted on 07/24/2002 10:59:57 AM PDT by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aShepard
Yeah, but Harken and Halliburton.
43 posted on 07/24/2002 12:00:37 PM PDT by Benrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aShepard
Indeed, actions by Congress and the Securities and Exchange Commission have the potential of creating a smoke screen that will prevent real accounting reform. The Senate itself is the major reason corporations have been able to duck option expensing. On May 3, 1994, the Senate, led by Senator Joseph Lieberman, pushed the Financial Accounting Standards Board and Arthur Levitt, then chairman of the S.E.C., into backing down from mandating that options be expensed. Mr. Levitt has said that he regrets this retreat more than any other move he made during his tenure as chairman.

What???? You mean this happened before the Republicans took control of the Congress?? I thought Dickless Gephardt just told us it was all the fault of Newt Gingrich and the Contract With America!!! /sarcasm off/

44 posted on 07/24/2002 12:10:50 PM PDT by Dems_R_Losers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aShepard
correct title:

Who Really Cooks the Books?


51 posted on 07/24/2002 1:58:44 PM PDT by TheOtherOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aShepard
bttt
53 posted on 10/22/2002 10:43:46 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson