Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DeaconBenjamin
That would explain why Capital One's shares dropped 3.11 to 30.99 today too .... criminy.
7 posted on 07/23/2002 5:36:21 PM PDT by Centurion2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Centurion2000
"That would explain why Capital One's shares dropped 3.11 to 30.99 today too ...."


My understanding is that Capital One's grief is that they under reserved for potential losses in their credit card business. They issue credit cards to sub-prime consumers.

They are not in corporate banking like Citicorp and Morgan/Chase with Enron et al.
17 posted on 07/23/2002 5:53:49 PM PDT by APBaer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Centurion2000
Capital One is a sub prime consumer lender, while JPM and Citi are top of the food chain derivative players. In the end, they will all suffer badly in stock price. Going short on these guys is money in the ... hand.
JPM may too big to prevent failing. They are leveraged at 42 to 1 (I believe) in derivatives. There must be serious action behind the curtain right now to stave off disaster.
39 posted on 07/23/2002 7:52:29 PM PDT by Mike K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Centurion2000; BillyJack
I'm pasting a pertinent reply from another thread. Remember there's a Federal Reserve office in Dallas if money gets tight. Thanks to BillyJack, see below:

http://www.financialsense.com/Market/daily/monday.htm

"J.P. Morgan Chase, Citigroup, and Bank America are also the nation's largest writers of derivatives. These three banks have derivative portfolios totaling close to $40 trillion in notional value or roughly 87 percent of the derivative portfolio of the nation's top 354 banks. This is a high concentration in just a few players in what is a very risky business."


Danger in Derivatives
The media attention has been on the companies that have defaulted on their loans or have filed for bankruptcy protection. To a lesser extent, the attention has been on the banks. A credit bubble has two sides to the equation: the borrower (Enron, Global Crossing, Kmart WorldCom) and the lender (J.P. Morgan Chase, Citigroup, Bank America). Banks have not only been the lender and underwriters on much of this debt, they have also been the writer of derivatives that go hand-in-hand with the expansion of credit. In fact, bank derivative growth has been growing at double-digit rates over the last decade. During the first quarter of this year the notional value of derivatives in bank portfolios increased by $946 billion. Interest rate contracts increased by $972 billion to $39.3 trillion. So in addition to the debt debacle, you also have the danger of another derivative debacle such as we had with LTCM back in 1998. Many of the top banks such as J.P. Morgan Chase, Citigroup, and Bank America are also the nation's largest writers of derivatives. These three banks have derivative portfolios totaling close to $40 trillion in notional value or roughly 87 percent of the derivative portfolio of the nation's top 354 banks. This is a high concentration in just a few players in what is a very risky business.

On top of making bad loans, the banks also have exposure as the largest underwriters in the derivative business. J.P. Morgan Chase is leveraged over 700-1 when you look at the bank's exposure to derivatives. The net equity of JPM has to back those derivatives. If you look at J.P. Morgan Chase’s derivative book, the bank looks and acts more like a hedge fund then it does a pillar of stability of the financial establishment. The credit problems are only one side of the problem. No one knows what the bank's derivative risks are other than that they have $23.4 trillion in derivatives against equity of around $40 billion.

This isn’t the only problem the bank has at the moment. J.P. Morgan Chase and Citigroup made $5 billion in cash loans using complex transactions that were disguised as energy trades. This made the loans hidden from Enron’s balance sheet. Investigators found out that J.P. Morgan and Citigroup were Enron’s main source of prepay funding. The Senate Governmental Affairs subcommittee is now looking into the extent to what these banks knew and the role they may have played in aiding Enron’s accounting deceptions. J.P. Morgan promoted prepay loans to customers in the 90’s because of their “balance sheet friendly” nature. In addition to the Senate, the Manhattan’ district attorney’s office is looking into the role J.P. Morgan Chase played in making offshore loans to companies in an effort to keep the debt off the balance sheet. Insurance companies, which issued surety bonds as guarantees that Enron would repay its offshore loans, are now suing the banks because they claim the banks kept knowledge of the company’s perilous financial condition from them."


10 posted on 7/23/02 7:22 PM Central by BillyJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

42 posted on 07/23/2002 8:01:05 PM PDT by Mike K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson