Or perhaps maybe it is because Landmark Legal takes on totally different cases than Judicial Watch does.
Landmark Legal has taken on a lot of cases concerning public schools and vouchers lately, which is a subject that does not fall under the mission of Judicial Watch.
Judicial Watch will take on any case concerning government corruption and fraud, regardless of party affiliation--and that is what I appreciate about them and Klayman.
The fact is, that because Judicial Watch has challenged some of the unethical tactics of the Bush Administration lately, Judicial Watch has become an anathema to you people. This just proves that both major parties are full of hypocrites and that Judicial Watch is being as non-partisan as they have always claimed to be.
Mark Levin has more integrity in his little finger than Klayman has in his whole body!
Next time I need a homing device for integrity, I will just call on you.