Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dog Gone
You know full well what I am talking about.

Landmark Legal does a lot of stuff concerning public school education and vouchers. Furthermore, they concentrate on thwarting big-government agendas, whereas Judicial Watch mainly concentrates on fighting government corruption and fraud.

I have never seen Landmark Legal concentrate on the types of cases that Judicial Watch takes on, such as the Loral Shareholder's suit and JW's work with the Discovery process.

14 posted on 07/23/2002 1:14:50 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
fyi
15 posted on 07/23/2002 1:15:36 PM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
The reason that Landmark Legal doesn't take on the type of cases that JW is that Landmark Legal has integrity and is not out for publicity and donations from people that cannot afford to give.

Mark Levin has more integrity in his little finger than Klayman has in his whole body!
30 posted on 07/23/2002 2:37:49 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson