Skip to comments.
Bush's Impeachment Sought by Clinton-Connected Group
Newsmax.com ^
| July 22, 2002
| Carl Limbacher
Posted on 07/22/2002 8:56:34 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: wattsup
I can just picture the menagerie of flotsam and jetsam losers signing that petition; the homosexual hairdressers, the sasquatch feminists, the abortionists, the militant enviros, the people who whine that life isn't fair, the socialists, etc. People who have no inkling of how to be a productive citizen. All they know how to do is whine and whine and whine and whine.
To: SBeck
Discount this at your peril, afterall, the editorial board at American Spectator and Paul Mellon Scaife were both considered cranks way back when. It's Richard Mellon Scaife, Beckster. And he was never considered a crank; just a bankroller.
22
posted on
07/22/2002 9:18:26 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
To: Slyfox
Heh heh...my mistake!
To: wattsup
Don't know about the higer education part...........but trying to impeach the president may be vindictive, ridiculous, and transparent, but it is not treason. Just read the constitution or any dictionary definition. The meaning doesn't change with the change of incumbants.
24
posted on
07/22/2002 9:19:08 PM PDT
by
breakem
To: Paul Atreides
It appears to me that there is much more to this than meets the eye.
A couple of things strike me as interesting...
1. The Dems always say all politics is local. Plus they point to polls which say GW doesn't have coattails. Politically speaking it would not make sense to attack Bush under these circumstances.
2. The Clinton MO was always character assassination accusing the other side of that which he has done. Re:Newt, Bob Livingstone, Henry Hyde. Then engaging in moral relativity.
3. Early on there were posts on FR about a special task force put together by Bush and Ashcroft for the purpose of investigating corruption. We guessed it would be a top notch team of folks who could keep their mouths shut.
4. Bush refuses to release Presidential documents that go back into the Clinton Administration.
5. Attacks on Pitt.
All these look like acts of despiration. Why? I have watched politics for a long time and have never seen this level of vitriol from the Dems. Over midterm elections? One could reasonably assume there is much more at stake here.
To: rintense
That type of double-think would be amusing if it wasn't so frightening. I truly believe that the Dim party has become a cult, worshipping the Clintons.
It's amazing, they went from Kennedy to Clinton.
To: Paul Atreides
Phooey!
27
posted on
07/22/2002 9:23:27 PM PDT
by
Vidalia
To: Paul Atreides
"isn't W supposed to have the I.Q. of a turnip? Yet, he is this big mastermind who is taking over the world"
Pathetic is truly the word. These people are so terrified they are going to be totally out of power after the next election, they are going to try anything they can to try to get Bush to fall ... it's aint gonna happen - they have underestimated him again.
28
posted on
07/22/2002 9:29:33 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
To: Paul Atreides
I hope this BS gets picked up by EVERY mainstream press outlet that there is!!! Go ahead, you f_ckin' 'Rats - I DARE YOU. If they really want to measure the depth of hate for their king and queen (or king and king), they need to push this agenda. The backlash against them will put their trip to the ash heap of history into warp drive, while putting the "Open Season" signs up on the Blue Zone. Lock and load 'em boys, no limits in the Blue (traitor) Zone......hehehehe....I can't wait.
29
posted on
07/22/2002 9:31:19 PM PDT
by
11B3
To: 11B3
If the media does run this, they will selectively report on it, so as to make it seem that only the most intelligent and upright of people are behind it.
To: Paul Atreides
Good grief, no agenda going on between the rats and the media, no not at all.
To: ladyinred
I look forward to seeing Ann Coulter's inevitable sequel to Slander.
To: StriperSniper
This not just a bunch of cranks, this is well planned. Starting an impeachment drive two years into a President's term - during a war - looks like lousy planning to me. They're three years late. We started planning Clinton's impeachment in 1991, a year before he was elected. (But Democrats.com has repeated an error we made with Clinton - setting impeachment as the end goal, instead of conviction and removal from office.)
We also had a true visionary - Bob Barr, the first Congressman to call for Clinton's impeachment. Who will be the first Democrat to call for Bush's impeachment? Probably Maxine Waters. That will be hilarious.
As long as Bush doesn't get caught in masturbating in the Oval Office sink while a teenage intern licks his butt, and isn't exposed as a rapist, he has nothing to fear.
33
posted on
07/22/2002 9:38:58 PM PDT
by
HAL9000
To: Paul Atreides
How peachy!
Heard a great joke the other day:
'GORE IN 2004'
To: dr_who
Please Democrats. Try it.
If the Pubbie act like they did with Clinton it could happen!
35
posted on
07/22/2002 9:41:56 PM PDT
by
WKB
To: SBeck
Financial records turing up in trunks of cars, billing records....silence of witnesses who were jailed...strange characters showing up with sacks of cash in the White House. Hmmmm......There was enough material for the Clintons to be suspected. Their evasions were/are legendary.
The Dems are up to there neck in corporate influence and greed.....I hope they pop the cork on this sucker and let the feces fly.
36
posted on
07/22/2002 9:42:36 PM PDT
by
zarf
To: rockfish59
LOL....that's the same as saying "I'm an idiot."
To: Paul Atreides
Probably being financed by the so-called Clinton LIEbary trust. HEHE!!
I hope Bush will someday get his belly full of their petty crap and kick some serious booty. I imagine he knows most of the illegal business that went on in the Clintoon administration and could cause them serious problems if he cut loose!
Something tells me they're sweating the Nov elections because if they lose seats, Bush can finally play hardball and clean house in that filthy city. This upcoming election could mean, quite literally, life or death to the Demoncrat party! (Not to mention, our country's future.)
To: Paul Atreides
This scam is associated with Clinton - what else needs to be said?
To: Paul Atreides
"Step 2: We, the People, will elect a Democratic Congress in November 2002 with instructions to impeach the President, Vice President, and Supreme Court Justices."
I suspect they would face some problems chewing this one if they actually bit it off.
40
posted on
07/22/2002 10:12:29 PM PDT
by
Arkinsaw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson