Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NEWSMAX GOES "KOOK". Promoting Video Claiming Govt. Behind 9-11!
NewsMax.com | Burr5

Posted on 07/22/2002 6:07:14 PM PDT by Burr5

Chris Ruddy's NewsMax, which I used to have some degree of trust in, given that he was so instrumental in exposing the truth about Vince Foster's murder, refuses to remove an advertisement it's carrying promoting a video by one Alex Jones, a conspiracy kook who claims, in excruciatingly unexamined, half-assed detail, that the U.S. government, and the "New World Order", were in fact behind the attacks of September 11. They ALLOWED Al-Qaida to do this, you see, so that they could institute global tyranny. Blah, blah, blah.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: lelio
... he's come up with what he thinks is a link between al-Queda and world leaders...

Thinks he's come up with a link?It's not news to ANYONE that Osama bin Laden and the Mujahadin got support in the war against the Soviets from the "west"(read Britain and the US,the only world leaders that really matter).To suppose that these same cold warriors did not assist bin Laden in Chechnya is delusion.This was presented to the US gov't as geopolitical strategy by the career,unelected rogues in the state department who desire to see the end of US sovereingty for their transnational masters.It's not the US government,but rogues within it who use their gov't staus as a shield.It's the New World Order fanatics who want to militarize the US.Idiot McKinney tried to make political hay by pinning the blame on the unfortunate George W.She had best look into the maniacs within the state department who have been making US policy,regardless of who is in the White House,for more than(in some cases)30 years.

The argument on the other side is generally,no,no no,no!This is a conspiracy!This is a conspiracy,therefore it cannot be so.

21 posted on 07/22/2002 6:48:06 PM PDT by kennyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CometBaby
Click the blue link on Post #5. That's where clicking the Ad on NewsMax will take you. BTW, it's most of the way down on NM's site, and says something about "The Truth Behind 9-11"
22 posted on 07/22/2002 6:48:47 PM PDT by Burr5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Burr5

Well, any future tyrant has only to look at 9/11 for refrence..

I mean people were begging fedgov to "keep them safe"

Amazing, 19 guys kill 3000 out of 300 million and people roll over and beg for a police state when the fed dropped the ball and caused the whole mess to begin with..

23 posted on 07/22/2002 6:51:06 PM PDT by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Burr5
I think "the case", as you've presented it, with your help on all the crucial points, has been refuted.

Huh???

24 posted on 07/22/2002 6:54:32 PM PDT by kennyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Right in the middle, half-way down. Adv:Video reveals what REALLY happened on 9-11 and Who Stands to Gain!
25 posted on 07/22/2002 6:55:25 PM PDT by Burr5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kennyo
See post #6
26 posted on 07/22/2002 6:58:10 PM PDT by Burr5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Burr5
I've started listening to Alex Jones pretty often.

He does a little carried away sometimes, but I believe that:

1) He truly loves America and the Constitution,
2) He reports the news that many "mainstream" media sources and radio show hosts fail to report
3) He is correct about the emergence of a police state, and the goals of the NWO.

27 posted on 07/22/2002 7:00:11 PM PDT by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Types_with_Fist
I don't know, I read a book by Ambrose Evens Pritchard called The Secret Life of Bill Clinton. I remember the Vince Foster chapter being very interesting.
28 posted on 07/22/2002 7:00:24 PM PDT by TBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Burr5

You are correct sir.

29 posted on 07/22/2002 7:01:10 PM PDT by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Burr5
NEWSMAX GOES "KOOK".

And just when did you first notice this? ;^)


30 posted on 07/22/2002 7:02:30 PM PDT by sinclair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBall
That's MY favorite Clinton book. Should be required reading for every Democrat. Ooooops! Just exposed myself as a totalitarian!
31 posted on 07/22/2002 7:03:33 PM PDT by Burr5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Burr5
Maybe you should view it before you criticize it.

I haven't seen it, but I watch these $1 items being sold on TV for ONLY $19.95 plus S&H, so I wouldn't get too upset about it.
32 posted on 07/22/2002 7:03:54 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Burr5
Details Stock #: 14
DVD RELEASE OF ALEX'S MOST POWERFUL DOCUMENTARY -- FEATURES 25 MINUTES OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE OF GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE 9-11 ATTACKS

TOTAL RUN TIME: 170 MINUTES

DESCRIPTION:
THE GOVERNMENT NEEDED A CRISIS TO CONVINCE THE PEOPLE TO WILLINGLY GIVE UP THEIR LIBERTY IN EXCHANGE FOR SAFETY. NOW THE PAINFUL FACTS ARE IN. THE DARK FORCES OF GLOBAL GOVENMENT ARE FUNDING, TRAINING AND PROTECTING TERRORIST NETWORKS WORLDWIDE. 911 THE ROAD TO TYRANNY PART II DOCUMENTS THE RUTHLESS HISTORY OF GOVERNMENTS ORCHESTRATING TERRORIST ATTACKS AGAINST THEIR OWN PEOPLE TO SCARE THEM INTO TOTAL SUBMISSION. IN THIS BRUTAL EXPOSE YOU WILL WITNESS THE BIRTH OF A GLOBAL POLICE STATE THAT SURPASSES ORWELL'S NIGHTMARISH VISION. IT'S ALL HERE: THE HISTORY OF GOVERNMENT-SPONSORED TERRORISM, THE MODERN IMPLEMENTATION OF FEAR-BASED CONTROL AND, MOST FRIGHTENING OF ALL, THE NEW WORLD ORDER'S FUTURE PLANS. THIS IS ONE FILM YOU CANNOT AFFORD TO IGNORE. THE FUTURE OF FREE PEOPLE EVERYWHERE IS AT STAKE.

33 posted on 07/22/2002 7:04:55 PM PDT by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Information is information. Imo when people react vividly to information it's cause for attention as it belies a personal conflict. Iow, even in their own mind there's more to the issue than they're willing to face.

In the case of the WTC attacks there're some glaring irrationals. Like why the FBI would repeatedly table or dismiss post-1993 reports and indications of renewed plans among Islamic fundamentalists to attack the towers.

One should ask who benefits? Imo both Islamic fundamentalism and the Federal government have benefitted from 9/11. Have Americans' freedoms increased or decreased since the attacks? Some of the terrorists even had their visas renewed posthumously yet old people are strip-searched at airports. Are you aware the DOD mandated military bases to be ready to enforce 'lock-down' (Threatcon Delta) proceedures NLT 1 Sept. 2001 and held mock practices during the Summer of 2001? Having lived next to a large base at the time I saw some of the preparations and facility upgrades being made during the Summer. Just a coincidence I suppose but it may well be an indicator. What purpose were the upgrades? Then, post-9/11 what purpose did they serve? Perhaps they didn't know exactly of 9/11 but imo the intelligence agencies definitely knew a sensational attack was in the works.

Furthermore, many of the federal bills passed shortly after the attacks had already been drawn up. Also, how did the terrorists get the communication codes to the WH to call AF1? Why did the Clinton WH transfer secure telecommunication equipment "hand over fist" to Syria and in turn Al-Quida from 1996 onwards? Etc., etc., etc.

34 posted on 07/22/2002 7:06:02 PM PDT by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Burr5
I listen to Jones' shortwave show "infowars" and he asks people to copy and distribute his tapes to friends neighbors etc and get the word out. From what i gather he is a very patriotic person and i don't think he does this for the money, i think he's pretty secure financially.
35 posted on 07/22/2002 7:08:04 PM PDT by bok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Burr5
NewMax is still better than WND. It is not easy to say no for Internet advertising dollars which are hard to come by. I'd cut them some slack. Dumocraps websites have far kookier ads.
36 posted on 07/22/2002 7:09:32 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Burr5
NewsMax Goes Kook?! It's gone koo-koo years ago.

I can't believe anyone on FR is stupid enough to buy into a single thing coming out of NewsMax or WorldNetDaily. Neither of them has credibility. No wonder the left thinks the right is crazy.

37 posted on 07/22/2002 7:11:58 PM PDT by Silly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #38 Removed by Moderator

To: Justa
Imo when people react vividly to information it's cause for attention as it belies a personal conflict. Iow, even in their own mind there's more to the issue than they're willing to face.

Exactly right.

Paranoids will always have a paranoid reaction to even the most insignificant things.

In Ruddy's case, he's PT Barnum to the suckers who read, believe, and, most importantly, buy his copious bullshit.

39 posted on 07/22/2002 7:12:47 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Burr5
Where did they get the video - www.cynthia_mckinney.com?
40 posted on 07/22/2002 7:14:47 PM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson