[tacticalogic]

Realizing that it cannot be said without some degree of self-incrimination, I note that it's always easier to be objective about other people's opinions.

[Lord_Baltar]

Again, I agree. However I've been here long enough to remember how many threads got started complaining about how the Clinton Supporters where retarded because based on sometimes the flimsyiest of evidence, they wouldn't side with those against Clinton. In some cases, Folks around here decided he was guilty of things based solely on some unnamed source.

Yet, the Bush Bots (many of whom posted wildly on those afore mentioned threads), will twist and contort like squids trying to protect and defend Bush.

In the face of TIPS, the Patriot Act, CFR, Drapes on Statues, the refusal to release documents (something the people from the afore mentioned threads wanted Clinton strung up by his nuts for) still cling to their defences of Bush and Company, just like the Clintonistas did.

It's just amusing, when asked the question, "what would you be saying if it was Clinton and Reno pushing for the things that Bush and Ashcroft are pushing for now" They simply make some snide comment about whoever askes the question, declares them a Liberal DU plant, then goes on to praise Dubya some more.

The ones I really love are those who now say that it's Traiterous and Unpatriotic to criticise Bush, because he's the President.

Well, with the vagueness of the Patriot Act, the newly watchful eyes of Big Brother via the Bush created TIPS program, and the full, unquestioning blind support of the Bush Bots, I suppose it won't be long before saying anything against Bush, or Government in general, will be considered a crime.