Posted on 07/16/2002 10:49:48 AM PDT by Orual
The importance of the article, I think, is to publicize a vicious crime and to point out the irrefutable fact that it has not received the same media coverage it would have had the races been reversed. The author also speculates on what might have happened if it had been a white-on-white crime or a black-on-black crime.
Oh, I don't even hear his explanation for how the website is "questionable." I would challenge him right now to comb through the info on that site - which is a priceless source on this subject, by the way - and explain exactly how their facts are in error.
Then when he can't, tell him to take his "guilt by association" intellectual laziness over to Salon or DU.
Did the article get something wrong? Do tell.
Excuse this diatribe but..... yesterday this man gave a blurb about "we will go to the limit"- he said that they will "test the limits with the exploration of news". He went on with a pious declaration of how CNN would not descend to sensationalism. He said though, that they would seek out and bring news to the public. News that others dare not. Aaron Brown- anyone? Reminds me of a case about four years ago. Five white teenagers jumped on a freight train for a lark, they jumped off in the "wrong" neighbourhood in Flint, Michigan. A girl was raped and either she or a companion was killed.
A very solid man, a black truck driver, rescued the surviving teens- God love him. The criminals were young blacks. A racist crime, yes. The press? Silence was golden generally. Got it on the Michigan T/V- I think ,though. If only there were some coming together of right thinking blacks and whites. Hey, the white dominated press do not want it.
Yes it seems so.
Seems to have worked for Jackson, Sharpton, Bond, Farrakhan, King, Fissel Grey, on add - nausea.
Could have also thrown in a few hundred whites that fit the bill but didn't want you to feel good.
When a crime of the nature and magnitude of
this one are so severely underreported, you have
to ask yourself why. The answer is enough to
overwhelm your knee-jerk racist(?) remark.
This sounds to me like another glaring example of the blatant double standards existent in the government's ridiculous "hate crime" categorizations. If two white males were caught on a rampage like this, and if their victims were all minorities - blacks, asians, hispanics, muslims, or homosexuals - we would be inundated with constant coverage by the mainstream media.
Did the article get something wrong? Do tell.
I wasn't questioning the article's veracity, as I have no way of telling if the report is accurate or not. That said, the facts seem to generally corroborate with other reports; the problem I have is with the spin placed on those facts.
Skeptical? Go to the American Renaissance site and do the reading there. Follow their links. Google on the authors of the articles, the books reviewed, etc. See if those things don't turn up an organization with a serious racial axe to grind.
Regards,
Snidely

Possibly, I have no interest in AR. But the article taken by itself represents a legitimate point of view. Certain public servants, public figures and the national media have conducted themselves in a hypocritical & thoroughly disgusting manner regarding these murders.
Yeah, in fact I would. That is, if I had the slightest idea what the New Amsterdam News was.
>If a white on black crime is reported on BET instead of
>CBS or CNN does it make it less of a crime?
That's a silly question. Of course not. I find the source's motivation to be highly suspect, and they spin the crime quite blatantly. Take the following quotation from the article:
It is true that Reginald Carr had a white girlfriend, and it may be that the race of the victims was unimportant to him. At the same time, Jonathan Carr wore a FUBU sweatshirt, a brand popular with black rappers that is said to stand for "For Us, By Us." Some blacks wear FUBU clothing as a statement of black solidarity if not outright rejection of whites.
Never mind that one psycho had a white girlfriend, the other guy had a FUBU shirt on!! He must be a racist! Puhleeze.
So suddenly we go from "two black males commit horrible racially-motivated massacre" to "two black males commit horrible massacre." Still a disgusting crime, for which these two bastards richly deserve death, but probably not racially motivated.
I suppose I should give the article's author credit for even mentioning the discrepancy in the first place. Frankly, it surprised the hell out of me.
Regards,
Snidely
By the way, when I was attacked by a black gang in Landover, MD and beaten with baseball bats for no reason (other than my race) a few years ago, I was totally unable to get the story covered by the local media. So I can easily believe what this story says about a media blackout. And now there is a whole book on the subject, William McGowan's Coloring the News.
That's certainly intelligent.
You seem to be angry that a heinous black on white crime is getting some attention.
Hardly. If you'd bothered to read my postings instead of just going off half-cocked like a dumbarse, you'd notice that I think these bastards oughta fry.
Sorry brother,
What the hell is that supposed to mean? Why the emphasis on "brother?"
but the reality is that black on white crime is far more common than the reverse,
...and black-on-black crime is worse than both put together. SFW. and is going to be brought up a lot more than before thanks to fine web sites such as this no matter how much you leftists moan and bitch.
Get a grip, Hoss. Have a beer. Relax.
Snidely
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.