To: homeschool mama
You seem to have a poor view of women with your quip about fathers being nothing more than wallets with legs.
Not all women. Just women who seek to deprive their children from interaction with their fathers when the fathers only crime is not being someone the mother wants to be around. Removing this child from her father's life while happily continuing to accept his child support is nothing short of unconscienable.
You said it yourself. "They were attempting to get away from him and he followed." Then you said, "Why should she refuse child support payments for a child HE fathered?" So in your world, a father's physical presence is completely unimportant, but his financial presence is vital. Spoken like a true feminazi.
I don't know what to make of Michael Newdow the man, but Michale Newdow the father has earned my respect.
73 posted on
07/16/2002 10:41:50 AM PDT by
flyervet
To: flyervet
Just so you know...*I* know the mother and daughter...and know of the grief Newdow has so 'lovingly bestowed upon them'. Give me a break.
To: flyervet
**I don't know what to make of Michael Newdow the man, but Michale Newdow the father has earned my respect. **
Newdow the father used his daughter as a PAWN to further his atheistic agenda. Something to admire? Something to respect? I think not.
To: flyervet
**Spoken like a true feminazi. **
What rot.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson