Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kattracks
Because there are inherent racial differences in some diseases (e.g., people of African descent have much lower rates of malaria than people of European descent), the proper comparison for health is not African vs. European extraction but rather comparing African-Americans against people still living in Africa whose ancestors were not enslaved.
4 posted on 07/12/2002 3:14:39 AM PDT by DonQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DonQ
Oh, that's brilliant. Therefore, it will never happen.
16 posted on 07/12/2002 4:18:06 AM PDT by jim35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: DonQ
>> whose ancestors were not enslaved.

I don't think anyone in the world, least of all Africa, could meet that criterion.
22 posted on 07/12/2002 4:50:14 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: DonQ
Excellent analysis.

To follow their logic, we should compare the life expectancies of West Africans today to that of African Americans today. If the latter is higher than the former, we can conclude that the descendants of slaves, on the whole, have enjoyed better health and thus longer lives than the "non-descendants" whose ancestors never left Africa.

I wonder what that does to their argument.
73 posted on 07/12/2002 6:33:06 PM PDT by Republic If You Can Keep It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson