[cyncooper]

They're not supposed to make up their minds this early,

While there has been concern that those of us who think the prosecution is doing a fine job of presenting their case don't understand the rules of law, maybe it would be wise to consider the huge chorus of "Not Guilty" yesterday after Bug Guy's testimony.

They are entitled to their opinion and others with another POV to theirs. I shall not smugly imply that others don't comprehend such.

This is not directed just to you John.

[John Jamieson]

huge chorus of "Not Guilty" yesterday

I was proud lead it, but I was really already convinced; I just thought it might sway a few more over.

[Henrietta]

Of course you're entitled to your opinion, Cyn. I'm just having a hard time understanding why you have it, in light of the evidence that has been presented, particularly the bug guy. You seem to be ignoring exculpatory evidence and giving creedence to everything that the prosecution claims without much rational thought about credibility of witnesses.

It seems like you think that if the defense can't explain everything, then DW must be guilty. I'm a little confused as to the fiber evidence, too, and really wonder how it got into the places that it got to. The prosecution claims that it got there because DW took her into the MH. The search dogs say otherwise. The defense doesn't know how they got there. But the lack of an explanation of the fibers on the part of the defense does not reduce the burden of proof and burden of production for the prosecution.

I think all of us wish the prosecution had their man, but there is a complete absence of evidence to link DW to the kidnapping and murder of Danielle.

Just my opinion, based on what I have seen and heard.

[MizSterious]

Cyn, of course you are entitled to your opinion. And we are entitled to our opinion of your opinion.