Yes, the physical evidence does show that, at some point, she was in the MH. (the blood). Fiber evidence and the defendant's own testimony indicate that she was in the house at some point. However (and here's what you don't seem to "get") she was not in either place during the time period at issue, based on the lack of "hits" from the search dogs. If she wasn't in the MH or in the house or in the SUV, how do you think DW got her body and dumped it out on Dehesa Rd?
Please explain; enquiring minds want to know!
Is that really necessary? I "get" it just fine, thank you.
Easy. It's called--