Skip to comments.
VICE PRESIDENT CHENEY SUED PERSONALLY FOR ALLEGED STOCK FRAUD(By Judicial Watch)
Judicial Watch ^
| 7/10/02
| Judicial Watch
Posted on 07/09/2002 4:44:40 PM PDT by Paul_E_Ester
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620, 621-640, 641-660 ... 841-846 next last
To: one_particular_harbour
In case you didn't notice, tomkat came at me
FIRST !!!!!!! from nowhere, used profanity and said he didn't like me.
I guess in your world, I'm supposed to say thank you and send him roses??????? Sorry, but I don't understand what you are trying to prove.
To: Howlin
Good for you, that is of course, your opinion. Judicial Watch is only trashed by people who do not like consistency.
To: Jhoffa_
You had better be right about this or your name will be mud forever more!You know this'll never see the light of day, don't you? Another one of Larrys wild-assed fundraising extortion schemes.
To: christine11
That made my insanely late evening that I made you smile! =)
To: Howlin
#614 is right on the money (pun intended).....lol
To: Jhoffa_
Perhaps you should also consider that there is no "Proof" showing that JW is the corrupt criminal enterprise that many here claim it to be.
To: Howlin
Is a muskrat attackng the camera in #612?
(Wow.. It's like wild kingdom)
627
posted on
07/09/2002 10:41:49 PM PDT
by
Jhoffa_
To: Luis Gonzalez
I am going to try and make it to the press conference, I don't know that I can... Translation: You won't show you wuss. Talk is cheap and so are motels.
Comment #629 Removed by Moderator
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Perhaps you should also consider that there is no "Proof" showing that JW is the corrupt criminal enterprise that many here claim it to be.
No, and I cannot "prove" that "pyramid power" is a scam either..
But it sure looks that way without proof.
If Cheney (whom I love with all my cold, stoney little heart) is bad, then prove it and come back..
Otherwise it's just one in a long, long, line of accusations from some lawyer named Larry.
630
posted on
07/09/2002 10:44:47 PM PDT
by
Jhoffa_
To: Fred Mertz
Translation: You won't show you wuss.Lookie there! Another stink bomb!
I guess whether they're bad or not depends on the direction in which they're being thrown?
631
posted on
07/09/2002 10:45:39 PM PDT
by
Amelia
To: one_particular_harbour
Yeah, very gracious. *Sigh* What can ya ultimately do about this garbage anyway?
To: Howlin
I, on the other hand, feel that if there is corruption within Judicial Watch, I would like to see it come to light, rather than bury it behind what we would like to believe. What corruption do you feel there is at JW? Please be specific Ms. Mole.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Good for you, that is of course, your opinion. Judicial Watch is only trashed by people who do not like consistency. JW is consistent alright. It is consistently filing frivolous lawsuits that it never intends to argue. It is consistently publishing "news releases" instead of financial disclosures. It is consistently begging for money with nor regard as to where it comes from. It is consistently the most inept "legal" operation that has ever practiced law. But that is the key word "practice". They have yet to master it. I look for Jesse Jackson to join the staff to show these pikers how a shakedown scam is supposed to be ran.
To: Jhoffa_
I believe that is what they're trying to do. I have faith that they are doing the right thing.
To: Texasforever
It's nice that you at least state an opinion. Thank-you.
To: Fred Mertz
I believe we'll see that in the IRS audit. That's why Klayman is fighting it.
637
posted on
07/09/2002 10:49:09 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
Do you think Klayman should show the IRS everything as if he has nothing to hide?
To: one_particular_harbour; Howlin; DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
Here is a newsflash for you. My profile point happens to be a revised version of what Registered did about DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet and me. We decided to give it right back to him. That happens not to be the only one where he has used our screennames.
He also did one using a picture of Howlin that was criticized and ridiculed by many, many freepers.
It's easy to sit here in judgment when you do not know the history. The artwork on my profile page originated with Registered using mine and another's name.
To: Howlin
Perhaps we will and perhaps we won't. Political motivation should never be the basis for an audit though.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620, 621-640, 641-660 ... 841-846 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson