Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gcruse
Let's review the physics, shall we? Flying at 2,000 MPH only a few feet above the ocean surface means that (a) the weapon doesn't have a lot of control authority for evasive maneuvers, (b) not a lot of TIME for said maneuvers, and (c) flying into a wave at those speeds is roughly akin to driving into a concrete wall at 200MPH, Mr. Earnhardt.

BTW, I did some checking around: the US Navy uses Vandal drones (essentially rebuilt Talos missiles) as test targets to simulate the SS-N-22. If anything, the Vandal is a tougher target (better autopilot, a bit faster, better endgame evasive maneuvers) than the Sunburn--and the Aegis system still bags it.

150 posted on 07/15/2002 9:36:18 AM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah
 
BTW, I did some checking around: the US Navy uses Vandal drones (essentially rebuilt Talos missiles) as test targets to
simulate the SS-N-22. If anything, the Vandal is a tougher target (better autopilot, a bit faster, better endgame evasive
maneuvers) than the Sunburn--and the Aegis system still bags it.

That's the first good news I've heard regarding the Sunburn.  Thanks.

151 posted on 07/15/2002 9:45:21 AM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson