I see. We sure wouldn't want emotionally charged words to get in the way. Can you back up this weak sarcasm by pointing to some "emotionally charged" words I used in Post #98 or was this just a pathetic passive-aggressive way for you to try to back out of the argument? Let me know,
I'm not backing out of anything. You made your points and I made mine. If "Environmentalist" isn't emotionally charged, I don't know what is. Keep it going if you want.