Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

5 rules for (CCW) Concealed Carry Weapon
http://www.jpfo.org/unpopularsp-unknown-5rules.htm ^ | unknown | unknown

Posted on 06/28/2002 9:13:48 AM PDT by CHICAGOFARMER

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
"YOUR CONCEALED WEAPON IS FOR PROTECTION OF LIFE ONLY."

"KNOW EXACTLY WHEN YOU CAN USE YOUR WEAPON."

"IF YOU CAN RUN AWAY SAFELY- RUN!"

"DISPLAY YOUR WEAPON, GO TO JAIL."

"DON'T LET YOUR EMOTIONS GET THE BEST OF YOU." "YOUR CONCEALED WEAPON IS FOR PROTECTION OF LIFE ONLY."

1 posted on 06/28/2002 9:13:48 AM PDT by CHICAGOFARMER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CHICAGOFARMER
Well written. u.
2 posted on 06/28/2002 9:26:30 AM PDT by Britton J Wingfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Belle
Ping
3 posted on 06/28/2002 9:27:12 AM PDT by RichardsSweetRose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHICAGOFARMER
Rule #5 can be especially tough to live up to- but it is mandatory. If you are the kind of person who just HAS to "get even" with everyone who cuts you off in traffic, etc, then you should think long and hard about carrying.

Even though you didn't initiate the confrontation, if you can't back off and let it go, and wind up using that gun, a jury will crucify you- even if I'm on that jury! (Maybe ESPECIALLY if I'm on the jury...)

Fortunately, judging by the behavior of folks in Alaska who have a CCW, this is not a big problem- the kind of people who are willing to attend the training and jump through the hoops to get a CCW seem to take the responsibility seriously.

4 posted on 06/28/2002 9:31:16 AM PDT by RANGERAIRBORNE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHICAGOFARMER
A RKBA BTT.

A. The ABILITY to inflict serious bodily injury. He is armed or reasonably appears to be armed.

Or not. We just buried a LEO yesterday who was trying to deal with a naked, paranoid crack addict. The latter got hold of the former's service piece and put 11 bullets into his head.

It differs from state to state, and I'd strongly advise those who carry concealed to be intimately familiar with their state's (and city's, if pertinent) laws concerning deadly force, and current on changes made to those laws. In my state (Washington) you are justified in using deadly force to prevent death or "grave physical injury" to yourself or to another. In Texas you may do so under some circumstances involving protection of property. The penalty for not knowing this is potentially a life term in prison.

5 posted on 06/28/2002 9:37:41 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHICAGOFARMER
"For a male vs. male encounter the defendant probably would not be justified unless possibly if he was physically handicapped..."

I wondered about this.
Being "normal" sized (5'9", 185), how large does another man have to be before I can defend myself w/ my handgun? 6'2", 225; 6'5", 250; etc. Kind of a blurry line.
Carrying has made me a whole lot mellower, though, - I avoid confrontation like the plague.

6 posted on 06/28/2002 9:39:31 AM PDT by Psalm 73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RANGERAIRBORNE
to rangeriarborne

My finger waving is no more, I am more mellow, I am always more friendly, I avoid situations, I am more aware of danger and leave.

When it comes to protecting my family I follow the rules.

Yep you hit the nail on the head.

the kind of people who are willing to attend the training and jump through the hoops to get a CCW seem to take the responsibility seriously.

These people who carry are very resonsible and do take it seriously.

Michigan CCW birthday was next week. 50,000 CCW citizens have not had road rage, have not killed each other over parking lot disputes, and it is not the wild west.

Where are those gun grabbers now!!

7 posted on 06/28/2002 9:40:07 AM PDT by CHICAGOFARMER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73
to psalm 73

This unknown author is giving an example. You must decide if the rule applies to males. He said if handicap, or you against a professional fighter with legal fists.

You will known if you are a solid citizen and practice the rules.

8 posted on 06/28/2002 9:42:30 AM PDT by CHICAGOFARMER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RichardsSweetRose
And remember Gun Control: a good aimpoint, controlled breathing, and a gentle squeeze on the trigger. Why waste perfectly good bullets ?? (g)
9 posted on 06/28/2002 9:42:43 AM PDT by Salgak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
to Billthedrill

Your statement is TRUE. In some states you can protect property.

The 5 rules will work in any state. It has a very good chance of working in even the most liberal state with no CCW carry law. If I am attacked in New York, Kalifornia, Illinois, and he has a weapon, I will still take my chances by following these rules with the law of any state.

10 posted on 06/28/2002 9:45:05 AM PDT by CHICAGOFARMER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CHICAGOFARMER
Excellent information
11 posted on 06/28/2002 9:45:20 AM PDT by paul51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salgak
to salgak

Good aim
controlled breathing
and gentle squeeze

yes these are good tips of humor.

12 posted on 06/28/2002 9:46:23 AM PDT by CHICAGOFARMER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CHICAGOFARMER
"Where are those gun grabbers now!!"

Oh, they are still out there- millions of them.

You see, they cannot be persuaded by logic, or even by facts (like the fact that there is practically ZERO incidence of illegal use of firearms by CCW holders). No, these folks are quite simply AFRAID- of you, of me, of guns, and probably of mice and loud noises. It is not rational, and cannot be overcome by argument.

Believe me, I have tried to talk quite a few of these folks out of their fear of CCW laws- and it is just a complete waste of time.

13 posted on 06/28/2002 9:53:04 AM PDT by RANGERAIRBORNE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CHICAGOFARMER
Add this one:

Nothing smaller than .380

Sure, James Bond carried that .32 Walther PP - but he only faced enemies using blanks! So avoid all those new tiny .32 semis.

GUN REVIEWS free from ad-money bias - emphasizing woman-friendliness of tested guns!

14 posted on 06/28/2002 9:58:35 AM PDT by glc1173@aol.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RANGERAIRBORNE
to rangerairborne

keep talking. It is fun. Here are a few good ones to coin into your talks.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I am intolerant. I'm intolerant of evil. That's a good thing.
Tolerance of evil would be evil.
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Statistics show that most fatal accidents(which occur at home)take place in the bathroom.I don't want ONE MORE FATAL ACCIDENT TO OCCUR,THEREFOR I AM GOING TO GET THE GOVERNMENT TO BAN ALL VISITS TO THE BATHROOM!!This sounds pretty stupid,RIGHT???

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I use a similar tactic. . . We had a neighbor who hit us up with the "Just Ask" campaign last year. We responded with a big, bright yellow sign for their front yard. "This home PROUDLY Gun-Free". If they'd leave it on their front lawn for a week, we'd answer as to whether we were armed or not.
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
80 million gun owners provided protection for their families last night. What did you do?
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Joseph Sobran used to offer his anti-gun acquaintances window stickers that said:
PLEASE NOTE:
This Is A Gun-Free Household
No one ever took one from him. I wonder why?
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I carry in my synagogue open. The rabbi has no problem with it and even encourages me to do so. Hey its free security and I will be there before the police arrive.

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"It's been a burning issue," according to Bradley DeBraska, president of the Milwaukee Police Association, who says off-duty officers worry about retaliation from criminals they've arrested. "We basically have 50 different state laws that regulate police officers and concealment when we cross state lines, and we simply don't know them all. We don't have a clue."
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Who then are this individual with such a universal wisdom that it gives them the right to veto the judgment of this intelligent multitude of 80 million gun owners?
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
There is a huge difference between feeling safe and being safe.
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You can't control the wind, but you can certainly adjust your sails."

15 posted on 06/28/2002 10:01:02 AM PDT by CHICAGOFARMER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CHICAGOFARMER
Hey, it's the only kind of gun-control a patriot CAN support (g)
16 posted on 06/28/2002 10:01:17 AM PDT by Salgak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RANGERAIRBORNE
It occured to me recently that most small women (like myself) almost always carry a small weapon for obvious reasons. While my baby Glock is a great technician, I'm thinking a piece along the lines of Felicity Shagwell's would actually be a much better deterrent. And, the laws being what they are, I'm more interested in deterring than shooting.

Concealment would be the only problem.

BTW, can anyone tell me what that shiny revolver Miss Shagwell lugged -is?

17 posted on 06/28/2002 10:01:36 AM PDT by nuancey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CHICAGOFARMER; newgeezer
This is one 'conservative issue I could care less about.
18 posted on 06/28/2002 10:04:50 AM PDT by biblewonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glc1173@aol.com
T oglc1173@aol.com

Yes if you are ever in a gun battle, a larger caliber is best.

WE are talking here about self defense. Just flashing a gun will send 99.5% of felons running. Therefore, that last .5% where meet all of the 5 rules, and end up in a gun fight, yes take
Good aim
controlled breathing
and gentle squeeze
as poster #9 suggests.

19 posted on 06/28/2002 10:06:58 AM PDT by CHICAGOFARMER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
to biblewonk. This is one 'conservative issue I could care less about.

80 million honest american citizens provided protection for their families last night. What did you do?

chicagofarmer

20 posted on 06/28/2002 10:08:53 AM PDT by CHICAGOFARMER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson