Replies

Here's Gore's bogus reason: I was waiting for an analysis that took from 1996 to four days before Clinton left office.

My response is this: Gee, that really sounds like some delay of an "analysis" report you're waiting on, Al... You'd think someone high up, like maybe the president if you know him, or the vice president if that happens to be you, could get the analysis done before Election 2000. I guess not....

And, here's Gore's published excuse, for his 20 month+ silence to FL voters on this matter, from the WP article -- and this is the first time he has ever offered any excuse to my knowledge:

"Gore's closest allies say he stayed mum on principle: If he had come out strong before the analysis was done, the analysis might have been challenged in court as a White House sham. Other former Gore aides attribute the decision to a mix of principle, politics and Gore's natural inclination to seek middle ground."

"mum on principle" -- LOL... Al, you should have GOTTEN THE ANALYSIS DONE BEFORE ELECTION 2000 'ON PRINCIPLE.' The people in FL want to know what's up with this issue, and they are NOT staying 'mum' on it here in FL!

OK, I'm done! Thanks, AmishDude. :)