To: aristeides; Nita Nupress; Uncle Bill; Sal; rdavis84; thinden; mancini; honway
Any explanation for why the Murrah Building was first on the list? My educated guess is that it was deemed most vulnerable assuming that numerous targets were 'cased' by foot soldiers.
I think AKAL security employed only about three? folks for daytime patrols. And I think these security people covered a couple of buildings, not just the Murrah bldg.
To: Fred Mertz
I think AKAL security employed only about three? folks for daytime patrols. And I think these security people covered a couple of buildings, not just the Murrah bldg. If I'm remembering correctly, only one of those three Teg/Akal security guards was covering the Murrah building, and he'd already gone home earlier in the day on the 19th.
To: Fred Mertz
Doesn't or didn't a Pakastani related private security firm handle some of the "security'at the Murrah Building in OKC ?
38 posted on
06/22/2002 12:03:28 PM PDT by
lawdog
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson