Posted on 06/20/2002 5:49:41 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
Presidential reprimand moves representatives to action
NBC, MSNBC AND NEWS SERVICES
WASHINGTON, June 20 The chairmen of a joint congressional committee investigating pre-Sept. 11 intelligence failures said Thursday they have asked the attorney general to investigate possible leaks of classified information by the panel.
Yellow Pages Auctions at uBid Personals Channel Professional Tips Newsletters Shopping
Profiles of suspects; leads being followed
WE WILL cooperate with the FBI in any way possible while the Justice Department and the FBI investigate if or how such leaks occurred, said Rep. Porter Goss, R-Fla., chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. Vice President Dick Cheney had complained to the two chairmen earlier Thursday about leaks that he believed led to the disclosure of the National Security Agencys Sept. 10 intercepts of at least two messages in Arabic. The messages suggested a major event was to take place the next day. At President Bushs direction, Cheney called Goss and Sen. Bob Graham, D-Fla., chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, to express the presidents concerns about this inappropriate disclosure, White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said. Fleischer called the disclosure of the language of the NSA intercepts alarmingly specific. Although there had previously been reports of missed signals, Wednesdays leak specifically quoted from intercepts, something that never is done, NBC News reported. The intercepts had been discussed with the committee over the last two weeks and particularly in testimony on Tuesday. Advertisement
Goss said the Justice Department investigation was necessary because committee members are entrusted to keep classified information secret, and undercover operatives or U.S. officials could be endangered by such leaks. Weve got people out in harms way who are conducting a lot of serious business, Goss said.
ARABIC MESSAGES U.S. intelligence intercepted two Arabic messages the day before the Sept. 11 attacks that indicated an event was planned the following day, but the communications were not translated until Sept. 12, government sources said Wednesday. The NSA, which eavesdrops on communications worldwide, intercepted messages that said tomorrow is zero hour and the match begins tomorrow, sources said on condition of anonymity. Fleischer called the information that the CIA, FBI and National Security Agency are providing to the committee extraordinarily sensitive. The selective, inappropriate leaking of snippets of information risks undermining national security, and it risks undermining the promises made to protect this sensitive information, the White House spokesman said.
ON TV THIS WEEKEND: The world's smartest scientists and best doctors. Join Brian Williams for "Summit for a Cure" Sunday, June 23 at 8-10 p.m. ET only on MSNBC.
We do not know who did it, Fleischer said, but Cheneys phone call seemed to point a finger at the committees. Concern about possible leaks has been a key reason the White House has opposed setting up an independent commission to investigate the attacks. The commission has been sought by some lawmakers and relatives of the victims. Bush has said the intelligence panels were better-positioned to avoid leaks. They understand the obligations of upholding our secrets and our sources and methods of collecting intelligence, he said last month.
NOT A CREDIBLE WARNING On Wednesday intelligence officials strongly disputed reports that the intercepted conversations were a credible warning of the next days terrorist attacks. NBC News learned that the intercepted comments, which were discussed at a closed hearing of the House and Senate intelligence committees, were not from any known members of Osama bin Ladens al-Qaida network, which U.S. officials blame for the attacks. And they adamantly told NBC News that any attempt to connect the conversations to the Sept. 11 attacks indicated a significant misunderstanding of signals intelligence. NBC News has learned that the conversations did not involve members of al-Qaida and that analysts believe they were merely background chatter like most NSA-intercepted material, which comes in at the rate or 2 million or more signals every hour.
LATEST DEVELOPMENTS
THE HOME FRONT Ridge presents plan for homeland security MSNBC: Aviation security test remains secret Deal reached on classified evidence in Lindh trial Complete coverage THE WAR ABROAD Two key al-Qaida leaders jailed in Morocco, Syria Saudis deny access to arrested terror suspects U.S. faulted in deaths of Canadian soldiers Complete coverage
Intelligence officials maintained Wednesday that the words the match begins tomorrow, plucked from the data stream without context, were essentially meaningless because analysts could not know what the larger conversation was even about. A U.S. intelligence official, while declining to comment on the NSA intercepts, said a piece of raw intelligence that contains only a date provides little useful information. The official said that both before and after Sept. 11, U.S. intelligence frequently has received threat information that consists of only a date and a vague notion something will happen and then, nothing happens. They suggested that the conversations had been leaked by opponents of the security agencies under investigation on Capitol Hill, among them the CIA and the FBI, which have been sharply criticized for failing to coordinate their efforts before Sept. 11. Hill critics of the agencies have been peddling this for weeks, one of the officials told NBCs Andrea Mitchell.
NBCs Andrea Mitchell, MSNBC.coms Alex Johnson and The Associated Press contributed to this report.
It's pretty ironic how an investigation into intelligence failures is full of intelligence failures from the people who are supposed to be investigating.
I am trying to find if they truly do have to sign an oath or if that is just a rumor!
I just had to bump that statement because it says it all!
On a slightly different topic, did you know Fox News actually had this story first; however, they kept the actual message under wraps because they didn't want to help the enemy. So I guess we can all assume what this says about CNN.
These aren't the same D's who fought in WWII, these are the draft dodgers from the Vietnam era.
There's a Kennedy in MD running for governor who is dumber than doorstop, and with all the dead voting she may win. The D's stole the election in 1996 by fraud, what will stop them this year?
I see a later post also points out my concern - that it could be a Republican. I know it's Machiavellian, but this is politics (grin). The reasoning would be that the WH and Conservatives would assume it was a Democrat, thereby removing suspicion from Pubbies.
Also, I find it very odd that ONE leaker would give a scoop to both CNN and FOX.
O I see! The press had this CLASSIFIED information and were asked not to go to press, yeah? Three questions arise. 1. Wno in the press has a clearence to have this information anyway? 2. This leak was known to authorities and no action was taken before today and it is fine for the press to have it as long as they do not go to press with it, forget bar talk? and 3. Since when is the press accountable to the government?
Like I said this is politics at its finest! I wonder if this was actually leaked by the committee in the first place?
Makes you wonder, though. Would a Dem leak to Fox?
The fix is easy, but don't hold your breath. When these critters take office, they swear to the same oath as military people do. If I would have leaked classified info during my service, I would have been subject to fines, loss of rank, and imprisonment. These morons get a free pass, not even a slap on the wrist. "Bad boy, don't do that again!" just doesn't cut it. If they leak, fine them and/or throw them in jail, depending on the severity of the leak. End of leaks. But, don't hold your breath on that one.
I agree, if only because he has nothing to gain by doing it.
BINGO! YOU GET A COOKIE! FOX, MSNBC and a few others. Cameron was pissed that he got scoped! Here is the real question. The Government knew the press had the data and asked them not to go to press. If this was critical classified, hush, hush, mush, mush stuff, why didn't the government take action a WEEK AGO?
Why? Politics of national security.......Keep on grazing sheeple!
We all did. And it shows the poor quality of some elected people. Their need to blab is ingnorant and incompetent, and shows no regard for the consequences. Like, getting a lot of of good men and women killed, and megabucks' worth of hardware lost. They make me sick. Where do I line up for a free slap across their stupid heads?
I made a couple of calls, too, and the response was interesting...'well, I'm SURE it's an oath...well, I THINK it's an oath...well, I'll check'.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.