Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WESTERFIELD TRIAL: Week Three - Day Four
San Diego Courtroom Trial | none

Posted on 06/19/2002 8:45:03 PM PDT by NatureGirl

Here's the new thread, all ready for Thursday.

Testimony recently discussed includes fingerprint evidence, as well as Westerfield's clean laundry. The Van Dam home was (strangely) devoid of fingerprints, except for a couple of latents that didn't match any of the pizza party people or, apparently, David Westerfield.

Westerfield's motorhome didn't contain any of his fingerprints, but did have one print from Danielle L. (the daughter of Westerfield's ex-girlfriend), Jennifer (a friend of Danielle L.), and a partial from Danielle Van Dam.

The prosecution said yesterday that they would be finished "in seven court days".


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: danielle; vandam; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 841-855 next last
To: spectre
WHY do they keep droning on and on about finding Danielle's hairs in DW's house? We already KNOW that she was in his house!!!!!

Ceiling fans, cold air returns and general HVAC operations could move the hairs from place to place.

Come on, Ducek, move on to something incriminating.

221 posted on 06/20/2002 9:57:12 AM PDT by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: spectre
NOW NO BLOOD on bean-bag chair, just stains

What on earth does that mean???

222 posted on 06/20/2002 9:57:32 AM PDT by Karson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: spectre; Admin Moderator; Jim Robinson; MizSterious
Dear Jim,

Please consider all the many pleas of your FReepers and opt to right a wrong concerning the banishment of MizSterious from these threads forever. She has never even had a time-out and we all believe that in the heat of the moment, an overreaction happened. She is a vital member of our Forum, and has been dedicated to Free Republic since 1998.

I am making this final plea for a just cause, and will be quiet and rest my case from now on. Thank you for listening. Spectre's wife

B

   U

        M

            P

                !

                    !

                        !

 

223 posted on 06/20/2002 9:57:35 AM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
Miz bump!
224 posted on 06/20/2002 10:00:39 AM PDT by vacrn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
shipped victim clothing from room to a lab on 4/29...blanket from victim room...fingernail scrapings from victim...tape lift w/a flake...pillow cutting??...
225 posted on 06/20/2002 10:00:44 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
5/3...shipped hairs....cannot ID which hairs were shipped as sealed package when given to him....shipped dog hairs 4/26...
226 posted on 06/20/2002 10:03:48 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
Here comes Feldman! Foaming at the mouth...LOL!

sw

227 posted on 06/20/2002 10:03:51 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
Feldman crossexm
228 posted on 06/20/2002 10:04:08 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
special procedures meetings w/Clarke and Dusek..to handle mass volume of evidence special procedures were put into place for this case....several meetings w/him, supervsr, DA's, asst. Da's,...phone meetings w/Clarke.
229 posted on 06/20/2002 10:07:27 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: Rheo; All
Cut to commercial.

Is the Defense misleading the jury in presenting evidence of hair and stains that aren't directly related to DW's guilt? Smoke and mirrors?

sw

230 posted on 06/20/2002 10:09:22 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: spectre
I meant PROSECUTION misleading the jury...OUCH!

sw
231 posted on 06/20/2002 10:10:24 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
trying to get answers on how many meetings regarding the changes in this case from others....were procedures changed..sustained....addressi ng why changes and why changes after this case.
232 posted on 06/20/2002 10:10:25 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
cross contamination issues...if contaminated before it gets to him, you have no control...yes, as it is presented to me in sealed bags.....have to talk to scene collectors to find out how handled.
233 posted on 06/20/2002 10:11:49 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Do you mean prosecution? I would think that the NON human blood is presented because at the PH those stains had been brought up by defense implying the police had overlooked evidence. I think what happened was those stains were determined by then to be non human and that is why the detective who was given a summary of pertinant evidence was not aware of these non pertinant stains.
234 posted on 06/20/2002 10:13:11 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
took photo of jacket..poloraid....not 35mm....req's original poloroids be entered
235 posted on 06/20/2002 10:14:38 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: spectre
My feed to the testimony is awful today. Was blood from MH discussed?
236 posted on 06/20/2002 10:16:41 AM PDT by Jrabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Yes, I goofed and corrected it.

Feldman asking for polaroid photo's of DW's jacket to be removed from Detective's folder and distributed.

Sounds like some of the evidence, photo's haven't been shared...tsk, tsk.

sw

237 posted on 06/20/2002 10:17:30 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Is the Defense Prosecution misleading the jury in presenting evidence of hair and stains that aren't directly related to DW's guilt? Smoke and mirrors?

I've been thinking that a lot. They keep referring to a large amount of evidence, etc. How much of it means anything?

I may have a stack of lottery tickets, but if none of them have the winning numbers, I have a stack of worthless paper.

As a juror, I would resent any attempt at games by the People. Just give me what matters and knock off the little innuendo garbage.

238 posted on 06/20/2002 10:18:21 AM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: Jrabbit
I can't follow...they go to break and start yapping afterward.

sw

239 posted on 06/20/2002 10:18:42 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: All
now going over the 5 poloroids of pic of jacket....jacket is not consistant color in photos...could be due to plastic from dry cleaners...putting them in order taken.
240 posted on 06/20/2002 10:20:01 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 841-855 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson