Skip to comments.
Smoking Ban Puts Restaurant Profits Up In Smoke/They Finally Admit It!
Boston.com ^
| June 18, 2002
| Unknown
Posted on 06/19/2002 7:11:34 AM PDT by SheLion
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-251 next last
If this article disappears at Yahoo, you can find it
Here
1
posted on
06/19/2002 7:11:34 AM PDT
by
SheLion
To: *puff_list; Just another Joe; Gabz; Great Dane; Max McGarrity; JohnHuang2; Tumbleweed_Connection; ..
Board of health member Dr. Carl Rosenbloom said. "I think (the government) has an obligation to protect certain aspects of public health that an individual cannot protect themselves." I am an adult! I can protect myself, thank you very much Dr. Rosenbloom. Who governs YOUR life?!
2
posted on
06/19/2002 7:13:51 AM PDT
by
SheLion
To: SheLion
They finally admit it indeed! The only voices in the wilderness have been those who actually have gone out of business because of smoking bans. So they ask those who banned smoking on their own -- "No, everything's fine here!"
3
posted on
06/19/2002 7:21:01 AM PDT
by
maryz
To: SheLion
I have made it a habit for years not to eat at restaurants that do not provide a smoking section.
I always enjoy informing them, when the hostess tells me that they do not have a smoking section, that I will dine elsewhere.
4
posted on
06/19/2002 7:22:02 AM PDT
by
Kerberos
To: maryz
So they ask those who banned smoking on their own -- "No, everything's fine here!" maryz, if a business wants to go smoke free, that's fine. That should be their choice. But when an outlaw Board of Health goes in and makes that decision for them, it sounds a bit illegal to me....
5
posted on
06/19/2002 7:22:57 AM PDT
by
SheLion
To: SheLion
Banning smoking in Bars/Restaurants is one of the worst laws ever made. SOLUTION: Put "Smoking" or "Non-Smoking" signs in the windows and let owners and customers decide.
6
posted on
06/19/2002 7:24:37 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: Kerberos
I have made it a habit for years not to eat at restaurants that do not provide a smoking section. Kerberos, we only have three bar/restaurants up here left where we can go, have a fine meal, relax and have a cigarette with our beverage.
We, too, refuse to go to any restaurant that does not accomodate us. We refuse to pay for that personal abuse. And that's exactly what the Boards of Health has imposed on all of us: Personal Abuse.
7
posted on
06/19/2002 7:24:57 AM PDT
by
SheLion
To: SheLion
Board of health member Dr. Carl Rosenbloom said. "I think (the government) has an obligation to protect certain aspects of public health that an individual cannot protect themselves."Only from an invading army. Read your constitution.
8
posted on
06/19/2002 7:25:56 AM PDT
by
Gaston
To: 1Old Pro
Banning smoking in Bars/Restaurants is one of the worst laws ever made. SOLUTION: Put "Smoking" or "Non-Smoking" signs in the windows and let owners and customers decide. You said it all!
:)
But that won't give enough control to the Boards of Health.
9
posted on
06/19/2002 7:26:28 AM PDT
by
SheLion
To: SheLion
I think they can still smoke in Russia, now which one of us was an authoritarian state?
10
posted on
06/19/2002 7:26:40 AM PDT
by
steve50
To: SheLion
"Kerberos, we only have three bar/restaurants up here left where we can go, have a fine meal, relax and have a cigarette with our beverage. "It is getting more and more difficult in the area I live also. But I am firmly resolved that if the choice is between enduring, as you point out, government abuse, or eating at home, I will eat at home.
Besides, it saves me money to pay the outrages taxes to buy a pack of cigarettes. But fear not, I don't expect it to be too long until the black market kicks in and lowers the prices.
11
posted on
06/19/2002 7:33:22 AM PDT
by
Kerberos
To: Kerberos
Besides, it saves me money to pay the outrages taxes to buy a pack of cigarettes. But fear not, I don't expect it to be too long until the black market kicks in and lowers the prices. Kerberos, you can roll a beautiful carton of cigarettes for under $8.00! A lot of us in here do just that.
Sure saves a lot of money for Christmas!!!
12
posted on
06/19/2002 7:49:06 AM PDT
by
SheLion
To: SheLion
How come none of these Boards of Health have established a maximum toxicity level for second hand smoke. If they did, restaurants would be able to install air handling equipment to meet these requirements. Or not install because they would prefer the non-smoking crowd.
But then that wouldn't allow for nazi-anti-smoking doctors/politicians/activists to control the populous, now would it?
To: SheLion
"'You can't drive over 65 on the highway -- that is a health issue because of accidents, and there are many different rules in that regard,' board of health member Dr. Carl Rosenbloom said."Maybe because the highway is owned and maintained by the government. A private business is a totally different matter. Customers can avoid a restaurant because it allows smoking or, conversely, they can go over the border to avoid the smoke ban- like they are doing right now.
In order to get the title "Dr.", Carl got a BS degree (Bullsh# degree), then a MS degree (More Sh# degree) and finally a PhD (Piled Higher and Deeper degree). I always remember this when dealing with these so-called "experts".
14
posted on
06/19/2002 7:53:48 AM PDT
by
rudypoot
To: SheLion
Kerberos, you can roll a beautiful carton of cigarettes for under $8.00! A lot of us in here do just that. "You know that's not a bad idea.
It has been many years since I have rolled my own so I have kind of forgotten about it. Maybe I will pay a visit to my local tobacco store.
15
posted on
06/19/2002 7:57:37 AM PDT
by
Kerberos
To: SheLion
BUMP!
To: SheLion
Good to see them finally admitting to losses, but I don't think City Hall cares, they haven't so far.
To: Kerberos
I always enjoy informing them, when the hostess tells me that they do not have a smoking section, that I will dine elsewhere I have been doing the same thing. Even made a calling card I leave with them saying I won't be back or thanking them for providing a smoking section and I will be back. It has my name,address, phone and email address in case they care to contact me. Several have.
Our town went with a smoking ban a couple years ago and the restaurant owners have complained but nothing has changed. Lets face it.. The Nico Nazi's have taken over.
To: SheLion
"maryz, if a business wants to go smoke free, that's fine. That should be their choice. But when an outlaw Board of Health goes in and makes that decision for them, it sounds a bit illegal to me...." I agree. There was never a law that required any resturant to allow smoking. It should be the owners choice. If he/she thinks having a smoke free restaurant would improve their business, by all means ban it but for these city governments to make it law to ban smoking is unconstitional IMHO.
It's a PC thing now. You are so Politically Incorrect if you smoke.
I smoke and I own a gun. How much more Politically incorrect could I be? "
To: Kerberos
How about ordering first and then upon the hostesses return, popping the question and promptly leaving in disgust?
When I went to Cape Cod, I was disgusted to find a community-wide ban on smoking. It cost several business money during my 4-day stay.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-251 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson