One thing I forgot to mention in my previous post is that the family knows it isn't a family member, they don't think it is a psychopathic stranger who randomly took her, they think it is someone who became infatuated with Elizabeth, saw the opportunity, and took her.
I just saw this. I hadn't heard this. Eveything I've been seeing emphasizes that it could be family or an acquaintance, particularly from the neighborhood. Someone trusted. I realize that we have been getting the media's interpretation of evidence which is often incorrect. Is this then the latest thought? How do we evaluate the credibility of different sources of information?