Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jadimov
Under which power can the feds legally claim a right to forbid the growing and selling of drugs within a state?

Well like others here have said, an amendment had to be passed to enact prohibition. And pot is a plant ferchrissake. At most, for interstate commerce purposes, the stuff could maybe be regulated when transported across state lines, strictly for control of agricultural disease.

But good luck now getting the FedGov to act within it's enumerated powers.

Dave in Eugene

124 posted on 06/16/2002 7:56:19 AM PDT by Clinging Bitterly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Dave in Eugene of all places
At most, for interstate commerce purposes, the stuff could maybe be regulated when transported across state lines, strictly for control of agricultural disease.
Actually you are being generous to the Commerce Clause abusers: The Commerce Clause is intended to prevent states from making laws that impede interstate commerce. You have to twist that intention pretty far to justify the WoD, and I think there is a good chance it would not survive a USSC look at a medical MJ case.
126 posted on 06/16/2002 11:17:39 AM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson