The point was that we have to rely on the Standard and old earth/macroevolution does not meet that standard. Therefore, it cannot be stated as fact.
You cannot build a foundation of theory on a tool of measurement that is wrong. It maybe, kind of working does not make up for that. No matter the level of success, 1% or 50%. The probability that it is wrong cannot be limited to known wrongs so it can be used to prove anything. How do you know when it is right? It is possible that in measurements of the age of the earth it has never been right.
Well, kind sir, please enlighten me on why you think the Earth is 6,000 years old! And please base your answer on more than your faith! At least i tried to show you my basis (even though you still managed to 'find fault' with it).
Oblige me with your viewpoint, and its basis. Why isthe Earth 6,000 years old?