Thanks for straightening me out. I was obviously wrong and your point-by-point analysis of my "silly assertions" and "tacky analysis" was just a breathtaking dissertation on your part.
Save your personal attacks for someone else, please. Also, for the record, just because I'm critical of Rowley's testimony doesn't mean I'm a Bushbot. My support for him is lukewarm at best. Just because your heroine Colleen can't express an original thought and has "not thought about how the FBI's equipment got in its current poor condition" does not mean that I don't support changing the Clintonized FBI. It's just that her testimony was a complete embarrassment.