Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ancesthntr
I am somewhat familiar with Title 10 section 311-312(?).

I think it does not contain any language concerning revocation of the 1792 act.

I was curiuos if the language was clear about which provisions of the original act were invalid and which, if any, were still 'on-the-books'.

Regards,

34 posted on 06/05/2002 11:40:50 AM PDT by Triple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Triple
I don't think that Title 10, Sec. 311 replaced the 1792 Militia Act, but that it was replaced at some other time. In any case, that section does define the various kinds of militia.

BTW, I don't think that the 2nd Amendment requires that members of the militia be armed, though I take it in that spirit.

38 posted on 06/05/2002 2:44:41 PM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson