Since when do logical or restrained policies work with democrats, especially when you have conceded the high ground by agreeing with them?
He has refused to become involved in Kyoto because it harms America. He kills terrorists because they harm America.
Bush has also left our borders wide open to terrorists, continues to allow immigration from Muslim nations that harbor terrorism, refuses to enforce our nation's immigration laws, keeps an open borders libertarian in charge of the INS, has banned profiling in airports, pursues amnesty for lawbreaking illegal aliens, allows Mexico to mettle in our domestic affairs and otherwise push us around.
When it comes to protecting Americans against terrorism and standing up for our sovereignty as a nation Bush is about as wimpy as they come.
I consider this statement ridiculous. According to you logical and restrained policies can not be applies by Republican administrations because they democrats don't like them. Can I infer that illogical and unrestrained policy making would make you happy?
Bush has also left our borders wide open to terrorists, continues to allow immigration from Muslim nations that harbor terrorism, refuses to enforce our nation's immigration laws, keeps an open borders libertarian in charge of the INS, has banned profiling in airports, pursues amnesty for lawbreaking illegal aliens, allows Mexico to mettle in our domestic affairs and otherwise push us around.
Can I assume from this that you're not a libertarian? LOL. I agree that "illegal" immigration is a problem that has to be dealt with now. I also agree that searching Grannies, thats my wife, shoes when she is an American Army vet and grandmother of 5 while not paying closer attention to men between the ages of 17 and 45 of Middle Eastern descent does not make a helluva lot of sense.
When it comes to protecting Americans against terrorism and standing up for our sovereignty as a nation Bush is about as wimpy as they come.
Tell that to the dead skells pushing up poppies in Afghanistan.