Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jlogajan
Your petty objection to one item proves you lack the cajones to challenge my central contention, which (again) is:

You can't claim, as you did in Post #37, that "There is no link between abortion and breast cancer" as if it's a settled matter, unless you're either ignorant or deliberately being intellectually dishonest.

Based on your responses, I choose the latter.

169 posted on 05/28/2002 9:59:22 PM PDT by litany_of_lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]


To: litany_of_lies
The size of the Daling study is worth noting (1,806 women -- 845 women who had breast cancer were compared with a "control" group of 961 women who did not). I mention this because the NCI stated that most of the studies that were done, which showed the increased risk, were small and involved only several hundred women.

Ha ha. The Denmark study was of 1.5 million women. Which the author of this polemic claimed was "a study that matched their political views and lo and behold they found just what they wanted in little Denmark."

Your very very biased author completely fails to account for recall bias in the studies he likes. Well, he can't make it go away so easily. Sorry.

171 posted on 05/29/2002 5:27:25 AM PDT by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson