Posted on 05/09/2002 6:08:14 AM PDT by SJackson
The Chicago Police Department's Internal Affairs Division has launched an investigation to determine why a South Side woman who made three calls to 911 to report that her husband was violating an order of protection was murdered before police arrived on the scene.
A pair of police cars converged on the scene 17 minutes after the victim's first Friday night call to 911, but Ronyale White, 31, was dead on the bedroom floor with a gunshot wound in her head.
Whether a quicker response would have saved White's life is unknown. Even so, the question is why did officers take 17 minutes to arrive at her home in the 10600 block of South La Salle.
Was White's initial call--that her husband was violating the order of protection--given the "Priority 1A" status it deserved?
IAD opened a "complaint registered" in response to questions raised by the Chicago Sun-Times and by Leslie Landis, domestic violence liaison to Mayor Daley.
"Initially, the sequence of calls, when you look at it, appear to be within the guidelines, but it's questionable," police spokesman Pat Camden said.
White made three calls to 911 --at 11:40 p.m., 11:45 p.m. and at 11:50 p.m., prosecutors said.
Although police cars were reportedly dispatched to the scene after each of the three calls, none arrived at White's home until 11:57 p.m. That's when two cars arrived simultaneously and officers found White's body on the bedroom floor, said Larry Langford, spokesman for the city's Office of Emergency Communications.
In the first call, White is heard saying her husband, Louis Drexel, 30, is outside her home and she has an order of protection against him.
Dispatchers then hear her saying, " 'He's inside the house,' " prosecutor LuAnn Rodi Snow said.
In the second call, White says Drexel left the house and was "punching holes in the tires of the Durango. He has a gun," Rodi Snow said. "He said she's going to die."
In the third and final call, operators hear a man's voice threatening death, then a loud noise, apparently a door being kicked in. Five seconds later, two shots are heard and the phone goes dead.
White had locked the door of her bedroom and activated a tape recorder, which captured much of the attack, including the gunshots. After the attack, Drexel put the gun in her hand in a failed attempt to make it appear to be a suicide, the prosecutor said.
Investigators said they think the gun was the same gun Drexel had reported stolen in early April.
After the shooting, Drexel went to his mother's Forest Park home. The mother called police, who arrived on the scene as Drexel was attempting suicide. The bullet grazed his right temple. Drexel was later hospitalized. He wore a blue hospital smock during a bond hearing Tuesday.
He was charged with first-degree murder and ordered held without bond.
The murder of a battered woman who made three frantic calls to 911 angered victims' advocates, including Landis.
"If that's how things transpired, it's a tragedy. The response should have been prompter. . . . Priority One calls should receive a response that's faster than 17 minutes," Landis said.
"We need to examine what we can do to prevent that kind of occurrence in the future. I'm asking them to investigate it."
Joyce Coffee, executive director of Family Rescue, a South Side nonprofit, said she was "saddened" by the police response, especially in light of recent changes that have bolstered police training on domestic violence and elevated emergency calls to the Priority One status that requires immediate dispatch.
Langford acknowledged that the 911 call-taker had the option of dispatching a police car while continuing to question the victim, but chose to interview White fully before radioing the first police car shortly after 11:43 p.m.
"The lady's demeanor was very calm and she was conversational. She didn't say anything in the call that indicated she was about to be bodily harmed. She said he got in with a key. There was no indication that he was kicking in a door. Because there was no weapon on the scene, that might have had something to do with it," he said.
I'm not in Illinois, I'm in California, and I'm interested in 2ndA issues everywhere.
It's important that non shooters and non hunters learn they not only look like, but are, their neighbors.
If true, this is the problem to be corrected.
I think they're largely designed around non gun owners, especially those who have had little contact with guns. Women may be the majority, but there are lots of urban males who've never touched a gun as well.
Their lack of knowledge about firearms and gun owners is the problem that needs to be addressed.
Sjackson, thnx for posting this...
You may be right about some, maybe many people.
But I think there's a big political correctness factor at play for many Americans, including many gun owners. I think many urban gun owners are intimidated by what they view as an un-PC climate, and that should change. And it can only change if gun owners speak out.
Your neighbors may fear guns, but I bet they don't fear you (hope I didn't step in one there) and you are the one whose freedom is abridged by gun laws. The guns don't care. And, IMO, the "non-reasoning" part comes largely from a lack of knowledge, not so much about firearms, which they may choose not to know about, but about gun owners. We've suffered from years of demonization, and we are the only ones who can change that in our friends and neighbors minds.
Yes to the first part. I'm safe in my home, and see no laws to ignore. But I see laws that should be changed. We're a long way from "cold dead hands" time.
Women by and large are convinced that guns are bad. With the amount of them that obtain restraining orders, you'd think they'd understand the need for guns, but they don't. Liberals feed off these women. Every new gun law appeals to these women. They invision a time when no guns will exist and fantacize how safe they will be. Little do they know that they will then be vulnerable to any 225 pound a.h. that comes along.
Guns are the the great equalizer for women. No women should be without one for self defense. That's my take.
I understand. It's the result of blaming the hardware, not thinking of Dr. Stochastic, a friend, who is holding it. No short term solution to that, but I think a lot of the long term solution lies in teaching your neighbor to realize the Dr. Stochastic, my neighbor, is the issue.
The anti-gun lobby were brilliant in defining the issue in terms of hardware, rather than people (all our neighbors). We, you have to change that. And aside from your fearful neighbors, you have to make your "stealth" gun owning neighbors come out of the closet.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.