[driftless]

Never say never. There are millions of liberals and women who would vote for her in an instant without knowing anything she really stands for. JUST because she is a women. I have three sisters who are big fans of her and who couldn't tell you one thing that Hillary has done or ideas she champions. Remember, the intelligence of the average American has been getting lowered year by year for a long time due to our liberal culture, media, and educational system. If that ignominious electoral reality is eventually arrived at , then that means this country is truly lost. Time to start the separation campaign.

[Capitalist Eric]

Agreed.

(((sigh)))

[cgk]

That's exactly what it would come to.

[happygrl]

While what you are saying is true, she also has some of the highest negative numbers ever seen.

I think the male negatives, combined with a portion of the sensible female vote against her, would prove her undoing.

On the other hand, the DemoRATS could always steal the vote.

[RushLake]

Really, what has she ever really stood for except as the poor victimized wife of the compander in chief? She doesn't get that much focus on the media stations that we tend to watch or listen to these days because she is basically underground. She gets a little play on WorldNetDaily, Newsmax.com, but unfortunately not a lot of light is shined on her. The africanhyphenamericans, envirostalinists, homosexuals, soccer mommies and their ballle$$ half men, the national extortion association, CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, etc. can all comfortably coalesce around her and get her elected. They may not be able to do it on their own, but together, they are very dangerous. With all due respect to those who don't think she can do it, never forget that many of us didn't believe that her husband could do it. I had to tape my mouth shut for months to keep it from falling open in disbelief after he won the first time.

[StriperSniper]

JUST because she is a women.

Condi, for more reasons than that.

[Zack Nguyen]

In the end, however, it's President Bush who may have done more to make Hillary Clinton president than anyone else – by ignoring the scandals of the first two Clinton terms and ordering his Justice Department to slow investigations.

This is true, and it has always bothered me. Not that I expected anything else. The Freepers here who angrily insisted that Bush just "needs more time" to bring Clinton's crimes to justice were deluding themselves, I am afraid. Bush promised nothing of the sort. Indeed, he made it abundantly clear that he had no interest whatsoever in gaining justice against the Clintons.

And again, the Clintons have learned the lesson well: few conservatives in a position of power are willing to endure political pain and discomfort to hold them accountable. The Republican Senate decided that Clinton was above the law in February 1999 when they refused to convict a man clearly guilty of perjury and obstruction of justice.

All of this may come back to haunt the Bush legacy. Hillary wants the Presidency so badly that she will do anything to get it. And Bush has already established a precedent of overlooking official corruption. Given the right set of circumstances Hillary could win. Let's not fool ourselves.

[conserve-it]

"Remember, the intelligence of the average American has been getting lowered year by year for a long time due to our liberal culture, media, and educational system."

They re-elected that traitorous bastard husband didn't they??

[helper]

Agreed, Agreed, Agreed. Also if the Republicans do not run a VP in 2004 who could be a good Presidental candidate for 2008 it will be almost "in the bag for her" If they keep up with "it's his turn" Dole types we will have Chelsie in 2016 and she will win too.