The bottom line is that it's irrelevant to the "missile shootdown" issue because the promoters of that notion have never been able to find even ONE bonafide expert witness report analyst who will agree with their "missile witnesses" allegations - the indispensable cornerstone of their supposed "case". They've never been able to publicly present any physical evidence either and there is an array of government material damage experts who contend there wasn't any as documented here and in the voluminous NTSB report.
Worse, if that was possible, the "shootdown" tinfoil hats completed the destruction of their credibility with their wildly reckless accusations that thousands of “government agents”, “government shills”, “government sympathizers”, “government contractors” and military personnel have been engaged in a felonious criminal coverup of the truth, accusations they have never been able to support with any evidence.
To sum it up, any expert who disagrees with the CWT Theory is going to have a major chore just trying to find people with influence to even listen to him, much less to help him get a sufficiently high profile public platform to re-awaken any meaningful congressional, major press or public interest because the untenable accusations of so many of the promoters of the "missile shootdown" notion and their stream of never kept promises to produce “smoking gun evidence” has so disgusted them that just the mention of Flight 800 : triggers a conditioned reflex to walk away.
Well, why don't you offer an opinion and stop being such a wuss. Besides, libelling anyone who does not accept the CWT spontaneous combustion theory a "tin foiler" is hardly evidence of not taking a position.
Simply put, those disputing the CWT Theory have to pit their experts on that subject not only against the NTSB's own experts but the manufacturing experts too, among others, and it appears to me that the chances of that ever happening are between slim and none for lots of reasons.
Since the government "experts" failed to make their own case, it is emminently good and proper that We The People to demand a second opinion and a better explanation.
There will be no rolling over on the part of those of us who seek a better explanation.
The NTSB can go pound sand.