[dawn53]

I may have supported his removal from office, but facts are facts.

He was impeached, but he was not removed from office, all in accordance with the Constitution.

The impeachment did not result in his removal, so he was the President of the United States for 8 years.

As much as I may wish that he was removed, he was not, and so his position as ex President and all the benefits that go along with it are still intact.

If you want to blame somebody, blame Congress for not removing him, not Bush for dealing with him as he would any ex President, after all Clinton who was elected by the American people for two terms.

[agrandis]

Baloney! Enough buck-passing! When is anyone in government going to have the guts to do the right thing?? I'm tired of lame excuses for all of them!

You ARE right, though, the brunt of the blame lies at the feet of WE, the People. First, we have to stop making excuses for cowardice and conivance.

[agrandis]

And anyway, he IS an IMPEACHED president. That is a fact Bush could use to make it easier for his weak little political self to do the right thing here.

[BeAChooser]

If you want to blame somebody, blame Congress for not removing him, not Bush for dealing with him as he would any ex President, after all Clinton who was elected by the American people for two terms.

SPIN SPIN SPIN. The FACT is that Ashcroft is not even investigating the crimes the Clinton's and their associates committed. ONLY Ashcroft has the power to do this the way it is supposed to be done. Congress never did have any real power to hold not only Clinton but all his criminal supporters accountable for the CRIMES they committed. ONLY Ashcroft has that power and he's sitting on his rear end doing NOTHING. Well in my book, that makes this Bush's fault and noone elses. NO EXCUSES.

[BeAChooser]

I may have supported his removal from office,

MAY? Are you parsing words like Clinton? Just how do you define "IS"?