Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

16 Bumperstickers you'll never see in Berkeley, California
Vanity | May 6, 2002 | Monti Cello

Posted on 05/06/2002 9:04:32 PM PDT by Monti Cello

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-234 next last
To: xm177e2
Fascism was a middle point between capitalism and socialism.

Fascism and socialism both advocate strong state control. They are examples of statism. The individual exists to serve the state. Capitalism involves much less state control. Private enterprise and private freedom rule.

Put all three on a scale and see how they compare. While there are differences between socialism and fascism, they have much more in common than they do with capitalism. Fascism is not halfway between socialism and capitalism on the scale of individual freedom.

I've discovered some shifts in dictionary definitions that occurred over time (or perhaps the definitions depend on the political beliefs of the definer).

My 1956 Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary says fascism is "Any program for setting up a centralized autocratic national regime with severe nationalistic policies, exercising regimentation of industry, commerce, and finance, rigid censorship, and forcible suppression of opposition."

My 1976 American Heritage Dictionary says fascism is, "A philosophy or system of government that advocates or exercises a dictatorship of the extreme right, typically through the merging of state and business leadership, together with an ideology of beligerent nationalism."

By 1982, the second edition of the American Heritage Dictionary says the following about fascism, "A philosophy or system of government that is marked by stringent social and economic control, a strong centralized government usually headed by a dictator, and often a policy of beligerent nationalism."

I wonder which of the above definitions was written by a political liberal trying to blame the excesses of the left on the right. What person from the right side of the aisle would advocate a government that fit the definitions above? Communist party members on the other hand voted with Nazi party members time after time in the Reichstag of the 1930s.

61 posted on 05/07/2002 8:32:17 AM PDT by rustbucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Monti Cello
THOSE ARE GREAT!!!!!
62 posted on 05/07/2002 8:35:23 AM PDT by RaceBannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monti Cello
One I actually have seen:

HANG UP AND DRIVE!

And one I would like to see in a place like Berkeley:

PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN!

63 posted on 05/07/2002 8:46:44 AM PDT by Houmatt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
One on my car, Progressive Politician my A$$, You're a Commie Pinko!
64 posted on 05/07/2002 8:46:44 AM PDT by MadRobotArtist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: MadRobotArtist
One that my company makes. "If there's a Final Solution to Idiocy, I want to be the guy loading up the trains."
65 posted on 05/07/2002 8:48:27 AM PDT by MadRobotArtist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
Then why did Stalin think the fascists were his enemy?

Because Hitler and Stalin were two gangsters fighting for the same turf. All of the bloodiest fights are between the bad guys- in WWII we had the good fortune of having our two most powerful enemies shooting at each other more than they shot at us.

66 posted on 05/07/2002 9:15:54 AM PDT by Squawk 8888
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite
Coca-Cola through the nose hurts. I love Country Music. I want that sticker. OMG, that is sooo, funny.
67 posted on 05/07/2002 9:23:10 AM PDT by CollegeRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
MY OTHER LETHAL WEAPON IS A GLOCK
68 posted on 05/07/2002 9:54:01 AM PDT by spaceman spiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
Hitler's outfit was named the National Socialist Workers Party. the fiction that what he promoted wasn't socialism was started by the Anerican left after Hitler turned on the Soviet Union . National socialism is socialism none the less.
69 posted on 05/07/2002 10:02:21 AM PDT by texicano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Monti Cello
My favorite: "Vote Democrat- it's easier than getting a job!"
70 posted on 05/07/2002 10:06:01 AM PDT by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destructor
Here's one more:

PACIFISM IN THE FACE OF ATTACK IS SUICIDE

71 posted on 05/07/2002 10:11:46 AM PDT by Monti Cello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Monti Cello
Where can I obtain the entire collection? Do I get one in my Happy Meal?


72 posted on 05/07/2002 10:13:30 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite;CollegeRepublican

73 posted on 05/07/2002 10:23:03 AM PDT by martin_fierro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite
"I Love Country Music,"

BWAHAHA...

74 posted on 05/07/2002 10:34:51 AM PDT by maxwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
Hitler was not a "socialist," he was a fascist. There was a difference.

No, xm177e2, I am afraid you are still wrong.

The Nazis were/are 'National Socialists'.

Adolph Hitler headed the National Socialist German Workers Party .

Again, xm177e2, we can't change a word's meaning just because we feel it doesn't suit us.

On the other hand,"Fascism was a middle point between capitalism and socialism" is just plain stupid. You sound like some college sophomore feminist studies major.

75 posted on 05/07/2002 10:34:58 AM PDT by martin gibson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: martin gibson
Fascism was advertised as a middle point between capitalism and socialism. It retained aspects of both. At that time, "capitalists" like Delano Roosevelt were increasing the size of the public sector of the economy. So you can't just define socialism as a government-controlled economy.
76 posted on 05/07/2002 10:38:01 AM PDT by xm177e2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
Man Boils At Zero Degrees Freedom.

Excellent!

77 posted on 05/07/2002 10:39:15 AM PDT by StriperSniper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Monti Cello
MY WIFE'S COUSIN'S GRANDFATHER IN-LAW WAS BLACK -
WHERE MY REPARATIONS?

78 posted on 05/07/2002 10:39:50 AM PDT by gura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monti Cello
MY WIFE'S COUSIN'S GRANDFATHER IN-LAW WAS BLACK -
WHERE MY REPARATIONS?

79 posted on 05/07/2002 10:39:59 AM PDT by gura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
No, socialism does not give power to the people, but theoretically, it's supposed to. And fascism is not. They are very similar...

Dude,...give it up. You are either ignorant or just really stupid....

Hugs,

Martin

80 posted on 05/07/2002 10:40:44 AM PDT by martin gibson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-234 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson