Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Bush Two-Step
Wall St Journal ^ | April 30, 2002

Posted on 04/30/2002 7:13:24 AM PDT by SJackson

Edited on 04/22/2004 11:46:29 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Either President Bush can't make up his mind, or he is running one of the most devilishly clever Middle East policy acts since Richard Nixon last dined with Henry Kissinger. In Texas, we suppose they'd call the latter interpretation the two-step.


(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Israel
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Either President Bush can't make up his mind, or he is running one of the most devilishly clever Middle East policy acts since Richard Nixon last dined with Henry Kissinger.

I probably side with the latter, but this pretty much sums up GWBs performance from a political perspective.

1 posted on 04/30/2002 7:13:24 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson
I probably side with the latter

I do as well, however, I'm sure this post will bring in the foreign policy know-it-alls, who happen to sit in on EVERY White House meeting and know for a fact what this administration is trying to accomplish.

The I don't care what you say crowd, will enlighten us with the REAL intent of Bush, and it will not be to their liking. The Reagan-bots will savage Bush, all the while conveniently forgetting their hero's 11th commandment.

2 posted on 04/30/2002 7:21:07 AM PDT by BOBTHENAILER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
If Saddam is history and there have been no more 911's by this time next year, we will know the answer to the question.
3 posted on 04/30/2002 7:21:29 AM PDT by ZeitgeistSurfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Can anyone explain why would Saddam Hussein be a greater threat to us than, let's say China. Or North Korea? Or even Russia? Or Pakistan? Or Iran?

It would only take a little coup in Pakistan and we would instantly get a nuclear-armed enemy. What are we going to do then? What if the coup happens while we have 100,000 troops at Kuwait's border with Iraq? What if the Chinese suddenly decide they don't like us no more?

Please note that there's very little that Iraq or Saddam could do to us. Most of the others I mentioned above could do us A LOT of harm.

Could it be that what distinguishes Iraq from the other 'suspects' is its being Israel's most powerful/dangerous enemy in the region?

4 posted on 04/30/2002 7:21:39 AM PDT by A Vast RightWing Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
I also side with the latter...
Rope a Dope 101
5 posted on 04/30/2002 7:22:54 AM PDT by evad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
Can anyone explain why would Saddam Hussein be a greater threat to us than, let's say China. Or North Korea? Or even Russia? Or Pakistan? Or Iran?

Not to belittle the threat of the other candidates but my guess is that unlike Russia or China, Saddam is also delusional. That being the case he is much more likely to do something real stooooopid.

6 posted on 04/30/2002 7:28:27 AM PDT by evad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
The WSJ is being too nice to Bush. The truth is he caved in to Abdullah and his daddy's failed advisors are now running the show. These are the same idiots who botched the Gulf War.
7 posted on 04/30/2002 7:34:18 AM PDT by LarryM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
and there's no reason to believe he'll take this ultimatum any more seriously than the others.

Arafat obviously hasn't studied President Bush too closely, or he'd know not to mess with Texas.

I'd HATE to be on the wrong side of this President!

8 posted on 04/30/2002 7:35:05 AM PDT by mombonn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
I side with the latter and this is my reasoning.

You could only pull it off if you are willing to take "heat" and let your methodology be dragged through the mud by the media. Basically willing to take the "dumb and incompetent" label that has been applied to him so often, only to be proven wrong when things worked out.

To pull off the latter, you'd have to have very little ego involved in decision making.

I think Bush has demonstrated in the past that he doesn't let his ego or the need for positive press get in his way.

9 posted on 04/30/2002 7:35:41 AM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; JohnHuang2
What we are seeing is a delicate strategery being played out by W. He is willing to take whatever hits come his way to get the job done. It sure is interesting to watch...

John, fyi...

10 posted on 04/30/2002 7:35:49 AM PDT by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
Could it be that what distinguishes Iraq from the other 'suspects' is its being Israel's most powerful/dangerous enemy in the region?

That, or the fact that junior has to go in and clean up after daddy's failed attempt, to help daddy save face.

11 posted on 04/30/2002 7:40:47 AM PDT by in_troth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mombonn
Rumor has it that Mr Bush enjoyed the game of Poker at one time. I would bet that his guests left with less money than they started the game with.
12 posted on 04/30/2002 7:50:05 AM PDT by cpdiii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii
You're confusing investors with poker players, I think.
13 posted on 04/30/2002 7:52:28 AM PDT by altayann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
The REAL Texas two-step ...

RPTR1: Governor, what do you think of the crisis in the Middle East?
GOV: I was saying, just this morning at the weekly prayer breakfast in this historic capital, that it behooves both the Jews and the Arabs to settle their differences in a Christian manner.

Fellow Texans, I am proudly standing here to humbly say,
I assure you .. and I mean it ..
Now who says I don’t speak out as plain as day;
And, fellow Texans, I’m for progress and the flag, long may it fly.
I’m a poor boy, come to greatness, so it follows that I cannot tell a lie.

RPTR2: What the hell did he say?
RPTR1: Same as usual … not a damn thing.

Oooh, I love to dance a little sidestep,
Now they see me, now they don’t, I’ve come and gone.
Oooh, I love to sweep around the wide step,
Cut a little swath and lead the people on.

Now, my good friends, it behooves me to be solemn and declare,
I’m for goodness, and for profit,
And for living clean and saying daily prayers;
And, now, my good friends, you can sleep nights, I’ll continue to stand tall.
You can trust me, for I promise, I shall keep a watchful eye upon y’all.

RPTR1: Did you get any of that?
RPTR2: I hear him talking, but he don’t come in.

Oooh, I love to dance a little sidestep,
Now they see me, now they don’t, I’ve come and gone.
And, oooh, I love to sweep around the wide step,
Cut a little swath and lead the people on.

Melvin P. Thorpe: Governor, why has the Chicken Ranch operation been so long ignored?
GOV: We should be having some acoustic problems in here.
MPT: Aren’t you afraid of possible pay-offs and bribes?
GOV: Melvin, I’m proud of you.
MPT: Enough of this pussy-footin’ governor, what do you intend to do about Miss Mona and the Chicken Ranch?

Now, Miss Mona, I don’t know her, though I’ve heard the name, oh, yes.
But, of course, I’ve no close contact,
So what she is doing, I can only guess.
And, now, Miss Mona, she’s a blemish on the face of that good town.
I am taking certain steps here,
Someone somewhere’s gonna have to close her down.

RPTR2: Do you have any idea what means?
RPTR1: Is that a “yes” or “no”?
RPTR3: It’s a possible “maybe”.

Oooh, I love to dance a little sidestep,
Now they see me, now they don’t, I’ve come and gone.
And, oooh, I love to sweep around the wide step,
Cut a little cloth and lead the people on.

14 posted on 04/30/2002 8:00:48 AM PDT by BlueLancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Actually, I think Bush's Machiavellian brilliance may be even deeper than suspected. By okaying the Sharon invasion of the West Bank, which has brought Jewish liberals into lockstep with Christian advocates of war on the general muslim world, he has effectively silenced the only contemplated resistance to a wider campaign against Iraq - and now Iran.

Although an avoided future is hard to see, what Bush may have been worried about is the typical resistance from the Left of any type of war anywhere, for whatever reason. A powerful element of the American Left are (were?) American Jews. But when it comes to the issue of Israel, the "Bella Abzug Syndrome" applies. Bella Abzug, a New York liberal jewish congresswoman, was accused by the GOP many years ago of voting to transfer to Israel all kinds of weapons that she voted against building in the first place.

Now that Bush has supported Israel in its war on the Palestinian people, it would hardly be reasonable for this powerful lobby to begrudge this American President a military campaign against Iraq and Iran, conducted for American interests.....would it?

15 posted on 04/30/2002 8:03:14 AM PDT by guitfiddlist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
Your's was a great question, but here is my take on it. To a certain extent Russia, China, & North Korea care what the world's opinion of them is. These countries know if they attack the U.S. they have to deal with a large chunk of the responsible world. Iraq on the other hand has never given a rats A@# what any one thinks about them. You are on the money about Pakistan, We can't and shouldn't trust them, they are too unstable. That is my humble opinion.
16 posted on 04/30/2002 8:30:26 AM PDT by sean327
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
one of the most devilishly clever Middle East policy acts since Richard Nixon last dined with Henry Kissinger.

Two overated clods on foreign affairs
Creators of DETENTE and opening CHICOM up to trade
17 posted on 04/30/2002 8:46:21 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude;Dighton;Veronica;Alouette;Dennisw;Cachelot;Catspaw;Yehuda;Knighthawk;long cut
ping
18 posted on 04/30/2002 8:49:27 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: guitfiddlist
Actually, I think Bush's Machiavellian brilliance may be even deeper than suspected. By okaying the Sharon invasion of the West Bank, which has brought Jewish liberals into lockstep with Christian advocates of war on the general muslim world, he has effectively silenced the only contemplated resistance to a wider campaign against Iraq - and now Iran.

You may have a point. I think GWB is acting from conviction, however by taking, in his actions, a pro-Israel stance, he may have co-opted much of the opposition to a later move against Iraq. The anti-war, pro-arab and solid dem factions aren't going to support him under any circumstances anyway.

19 posted on 04/30/2002 8:59:17 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson