Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Restoring The Church's Foundation
National Post ^ | April 26, 2002 | Raymond J. de Souza

Posted on 04/27/2002 2:58:33 PM PDT by Lady In Blue

April 26, 2002

Restoring the church's foundation

Raymond J. de Souza
National Post

VATICAN CITY - There were two stories in Rome in this week. The first was the American cardinals' decision to adopt "zero tolerance" for priests who have sexually abused minors. The second was their call for a vigorous reaffirmation of Catholic orthodoxy, especially regarding sexual morality, as the long-term solution to sexual misconduct by priests. The first step will be applauded by the broader American culture; the second means the cardinals are gearing up for a fight.

The sexual abuse story brought the full weight of the American media machine to Rome, complete with television crews staking out the cardinals' residences. Those of us who are accustomed to covering the Vatican in peaceful obscurity were suddenly hot properties, sought after by the famous but generally ill-informed stars of American television.

To respond to the most immediate issue, the American cardinals opted for the most severe option open to them. It now seems likely that a zero-tolerance policy, retroactively applied, will become a binding national standard in the United States after all the American bishops meet in June. On the key issue of whether priests remain in ministry -- parishes, universities, hospitals, etc. -- the comments of the cardinals made it clear that a retroactive "one-strike-and-you're-out" policy is the consensus. The adjudication of accusations -- an important step given the rare, but real, phenomenon of fabricated claims -- will likely be made by a lay board of professionals, parents, victims.

The cardinals hope that opting for a severe line on sexual abuse will begin to restore the trust that American bishops have lost. But they also committed themselves to taking a much harder line on what they identified as the "doctrinal issues underlying the deplorable behaviour in question."

"[Bishops] need clearly to promote the correct moral teaching of the Church and publicly to reprimand individuals who spread dissent and groups which advance ambiguous approaches to pastoral care," wrote the cardinals in their final communiqué.

The implication is clear. The cardinals' believe that a culture of dissent breeds moral laxity. Specifically, that refusal by some theology professors and seminary faculties to accept Church teachings on sexuality, especially priestly celibacy and homosexuality, produces the environment in which sexual misconduct becomes more than just a rare occurrence.

What does this mean in practice? The cardinals proposed a special "apostolic visitation" of seminaries, which would put "particular emphasis on the need for fidelity to the Church's teaching, especially in the area of morality." A "visitation" is a review by an external board which evaluates seminary practices and makes recommendations for future accreditation.

If the visitation is a serious attempt to eliminate theological dissent and toleration of sexual sins, the bishops will be accused of stifling freedom and lacking compassion. If the visitation attempts to stamp out networks of homosexuality which exist in pockets here and there, headlines will follow about bigotry and witch hunts.

The American bishops know all this. It may explain why they have been reluctant to act on questions of doctrine, wishing to avoid divisive internal Church battles and the ancillary attacks from secular sources. But now their leadership has said that there are "doctrinal" foundations to sexual scandals. What is taught has an effect on what is done. Bad teaching leads to bad morals.

That may not sound like news. But it was perhaps the most newsworthy thing that happened here this week. Perhaps the Catholic Church in the United Sates is going back to basics, returning to the language that the Church exists to speak. It is not the language of therapy, psychology, legal proceedings and insurance advice.

Pope John Paul II used the right words when in March he said priestly sexual abuse belonged to the "gravest manifestations of the mystery of evil." He continued this week by acknowledging that while sexual abuse is "rightly considered a crime," more important for the Church, it is "an appalling sin in the eyes of God." And he spoke too of the "power of Christian conversion," without which no Christian pastor would have anything to say to a world marred by sin.

Good and evil. Punishment and penance. Forgiveness and conversion. This is the language of the Church. The American Church, deeply scarred, is returning to her own language and her own foundation. If this crisis is to be a time, as the cardinals put it, of "painful purification," it will depend to a large degree on the Church rededicating herself to the purity of her doctrine and the integrity of her morals.

Zero tolerance for sexual abuse is the news for this week. Ending tolerance for doctrinal dissent is the news for the future.



Other Stories by this Writer

4/25/2002
- 'Notorious' priests would be defrocked
4/24/2002
- Abuse will not be tolerated, Pope warns U.S. cardinals
4/22/2002
- Bishops off to Rome in bid to resolve pedophilia crisis
3/22/2002
- Pope 'afflicted by sins' of pedophile priests in U.S.





News | Financial Post | Commentary | Science & Tech | Arts & Leisure | Sports | Diversions | Forums | Weather
Careers | Subscriptions | Site Map | Headline Scan | Advertise | Contests | NP Events | Contact Us | User Help

Copyright © 2002 National Post Online | Privacy Policy | Corrections
National Post Online is a Hollinger / CanWest Publication.



TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; clearteaching; restoration
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
FYI
1 posted on 04/27/2002 2:58:33 PM PDT by Lady In Blue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue
Great hope-filled post! Thank you.
2 posted on 04/27/2002 3:02:07 PM PDT by grumpster-dumpster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue
"The Church's one foundation
Is Jesus Christ her Lord
She is his new creation
By water and the Word;
From heav'n he came and sought her,
To be His holy bride;
With his own blood he bought her,
and for her life He died."
-"The Church's One Foundation" -a Catholic/Christian hymn

Therefore, the Church's Foundation never needed to be restored, because HE is risen! The author does bring up some great points however.

3 posted on 04/27/2002 3:06:50 PM PDT by Pyro7480
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue
The second was their call for a vigorous reaffirmation of Catholic orthodoxy, especially regarding sexual morality, as the long-term solution to sexual misconduct by priests.
4 posted on 04/27/2002 3:12:28 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grumpster-dumpster
Me too,grumpster-dumpster,me too!
5 posted on 04/27/2002 3:24:58 PM PDT by Lady In Blue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
I agree, calling for a reaffirmation of orthodox Catholic teaching was very positive. But I'd be surprised if it gets very far. Some of the bishops (Mahony, for example) themselves were probably not very committed to the idea, and others are going to find themselves faced with such entrenched corruption and unorthodoxy in their seminaries, current diocesan clergy, religious education materials, etc., that it's highly unlikely they'll be able to do anything about it.

I think something more drastic and draconian has got to be done, but I honestly don't know how or by whom. Feelgood religion with no substance has just become the norm.

This couldn't have happened at a worse time. When Islam attacks here - which it will - most Catholics will have so little knowledge of and trust in their own religion that they'll probably just give up without a fight. Nobody's going to want to get martyred for a picture of a butterfly and a rainbow (current church banner).

6 posted on 04/27/2002 3:26:06 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
Thank you posting part of such a beautiful hymn.
7 posted on 04/27/2002 3:26:47 PM PDT by Lady In Blue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Yes! And that's the part I liked the best!
8 posted on 04/27/2002 3:28:12 PM PDT by Lady In Blue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ken5050; Slyfox; rose; ClearBlueSky; Aunt Polgara; Codie; ELS; katnip;viadexter; pax_et_bonum...
Brilliant post! Kudos to you, Lady In Blue!
9 posted on 04/27/2002 3:36:17 PM PDT by history_matters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Angelique; ventana; roachie; constitutiongirl; goldenstategirl; allend; RobbyS; father_elijah...
Hopeful BUMP
10 posted on 04/27/2002 3:37:01 PM PDT by history_matters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sfousa; ejo; kidd; Cap'n Crunch; Domestic Church; JMJ333; BlessedBeGod; nina0113; Steve0113...
BTTT
11 posted on 04/27/2002 3:37:32 PM PDT by history_matters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: grumpster-dumpster; Petronski; Diago; .45MAN; Aquinasfan; Antoninus; aposiopetic...
((((((ping))))))
12 posted on 04/27/2002 3:38:11 PM PDT by history_matters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza; OxfordMovement; nickcarraway; jrherreid; Coleus; Palladin; Aggie Mama; glorygirl...
p i n g

13 posted on 04/27/2002 3:38:42 PM PDT by history_matters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue
Leviticus 18:22 'You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination.

I Corinthians 1 6:9-10 Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God.

Well seminary professors and students... any questions?

14 posted on 04/27/2002 3:47:18 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
The second was their call for a vigorous reaffirmation of Catholic orthodoxy, especially regarding sexual morality, as the long-term solution to sexual misconduct by priests.

In all this posting and talking about sexual morality not one word of mention concerning the use of artificial means of birth control. The widespread acceptance of this is perhaps the biggest scandal of all. The laity will rant and rave about a few priests and not a word about this most serious mortal sin. Wives take pills (abortifacients), husbands have vasectomies and use condoms, wives have their tubes tied. So long as people are posting concerning the necessity of returning to Catholic orthodoxy and sexual morality lets make sure we cover the whole gamut!!

15 posted on 04/27/2002 3:51:40 PM PDT by Renatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
"The Church's one foundation" is actually an Anglican Hymn written in the 19th century by Samuel John Stone. It was written ca 1866 while Stone was a Curate at Windsor. The tune is "Aurelia" by Samuel Wesley, the Grandson of the great hymnist Charles Wesley. On behalf of the Anglican Church though, we're very happy to share! (There's tons of great information on hymns at www.cyberhymnal.org)
16 posted on 04/27/2002 3:58:28 PM PDT by waspguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue
What BS!! It is like calling for a ban on double parking and then claiming it to be a fix for something else. Sex with kids is not the problem, it is a symptom. not the cause. The cause is fairy priests. They gravitate to boys because they are so easy for a priest. Until the church afmits the problem is fairies in frocks and moves to correct that problem, this is perfectly clintonian. They have simply diverted attention using smoke and mirrors and claimed victory. BS!!
17 posted on 04/27/2002 3:58:57 PM PDT by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: waspguy
Thanks for the information! You learn something new every day, as my mom always said. I'm glad we "inherited" that hymn. That's why I said "Catholic/Christian" because I wasn't entirely sure of its origins. Thanks again!
18 posted on 04/27/2002 4:00:17 PM PDT by Pyro7480
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
Perhaps now would be the time to put an age limit on those who serve at the altar,ie.altar boys...Seemingly boys are picked at a very early and impressionable age. Easily, as you mention they then become sacrificial lambs for these wayward priests...Priests who should have never been admitted to a seminary or donned the Roman collar for their intentions were never honorable. They are not serving Christ' Church but are intent on mocking Him instead.....But within this article is reason for great Hope and we must remain steadfast and diligent to see this to the end...Peace to you brother.
19 posted on 04/27/2002 7:12:47 PM PDT by ejo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue
Bump from an antitrinitarian heretic. Now is not the time to be counting. Inspiring to seek rank and file Catholics taking back their Church.
20 posted on 04/27/2002 7:30:11 PM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson