Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bob Novak-Pentagon Says Iraq Operations Looking to September Start
ABC News Daily Political Tip Sheet 'The Note' VIA Chicago Sun Times ^ | April 25 2002 | Bob Novak

Posted on 04/25/2002 12:17:54 PM PDT by codebreaker

Bob Novak makes a United States war with Iraq sound imminent

The signal has spread through the Pentagon: on to Baghdad to get rid of Saddam Hussein, probably in September when the weather should be fine and the United States high tech arsenal will be replentished.

That's what Defense Department policymakers plan, but their cheers are balanced by apprehension among civilian and military career officials.

Some of them are apparently are crossing their fingers for Secretary of State Colin Powell to exert control over the situation. (ugh!-ed.)


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: 200204; chicagosuntimes; iraq; novak; september
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-152 next last
To: Registered
I agree with 9/11/2002 - turn a "Day of Triumph" for the Islamic World into a "Day of Sorrow and Horror" would be how I'd do it
81 posted on 04/25/2002 3:31:41 PM PDT by Chad Fairbanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Thud
I didn't know of Novak's opinion when I predicted September last night in my email to Fisher. September looked right to me based on publically available information. Should we start the pool now?

I predicted 9/11/02 on another thread a couple of months ago. Not boasting, just noting the obvious.

82 posted on 04/25/2002 3:33:55 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
If this is true... I can sit back, drink a beer, and be... happy!!! Go Bush! Flex a little American muscle!!!! and make this world a better place!
83 posted on 04/25/2002 3:40:00 PM PDT by redwhiteandblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr
My worry is that Saddam knows full well that the jig is up for him unless he gets allies and strikes first. He and the other major terrorist nations in the area (Syria and Iran) could probably coordinate an attack on Israel and on various oil fields in the Persian Gulf, just to really screw things up

How's this for an alternative nightmare scenario? Through its puppet Shi'ite rebel groups in the south, Iran launches its own pre-emptive coup against Sadaam, removes him and replaces him in Baghdad with an "Islamic Republican" regime, before the preparations for our own attack are complete. All very democratic of course, just the way it is in Iran. Would we then have to re-think our whole strategy, while the Iranians tighten their grip on Mesopotamia?

84 posted on 04/25/2002 3:43:46 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
Translation--

Saddam: you won't know WHEN, and you won't know HOW...but we are coming for your worthless hide.

85 posted on 04/25/2002 3:44:56 PM PDT by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Argus
For me, I don't believe a word of it. The tentative date of May 8 was set nearly 6 months ago now. I know of no reason why it would be altered (unless brought forward a few days by an Iraqi offensive, or a desire to do it on a Friday...)

May 3 is a Friday I think...May 5 is the planetary alignment -- a real biggie, much more than in yr 2000. May 12 is the new moon, in the mid morning EDT.

Halbmond uber Bagdad?

Nostradamus says 57 yrs to the day since Germany surrendered, wasn't that, too in early May?

But the May war is supposed to go nuclear sooner rather than later? Isn't May 12 also the 20th day in Taurus? That would imply nuclear war right there...

These predictions are the source of the term "Mayday" for the end of the world, as in the sinking of a ship...I'm going off to an astrological site...

86 posted on 04/25/2002 3:47:20 PM PDT by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
"Ol Saddam knew about the last one and couldn't do diddly about it"

...Not to mention that Saddam MIGHT be running out of diplomatically influential, royal nephews and cousins and nephews-in-law and cousins-in-law, etc. to hide behind, like he did during Desert Storm.

87 posted on 04/25/2002 3:58:25 PM PDT by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: PA Engineer
Don't worry PA, if they are calling up guard units it is near impossible to keep that under wraps-it is going to be all over the local news...last time we had a 'going away' pep ceremony for the Gulf War
88 posted on 04/25/2002 3:59:29 PM PDT by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: texasbluebell
What you posted is great! Sums up where this Rat/Mole is coming from:

And guess where Novak has a summer home...in the south of France! Figures.

89 posted on 04/25/2002 4:15:53 PM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: PA Engineer
"Any public info I'll post simply because it may be disseminated to confuse the enemy or simply something that can not be kept secret."

Though it's possible that the muster of medvac reserves might be due to the possibility of imminent terrorist attack, there's no way of knowing for sure. Some info is more "public" than others.

It's better to be silent and safe than to speak and be sorry.

90 posted on 04/25/2002 4:16:05 PM PDT by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: crystalk
the source of the term "Mayday"

We were taught in public school that the origin is French. m'aider = help me.

91 posted on 04/25/2002 4:20:38 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Oh, no ANOTHER public schooler on FReep?
92 posted on 04/25/2002 4:23:59 PM PDT by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
A two year deploment for a terrorist warning on shopping malls?

Sounds fishy to me..

93 posted on 04/25/2002 4:24:09 PM PDT by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
"Sounds fishy to me."

LOL...well, me too.

It's only caution I'm thinking of.

94 posted on 04/25/2002 4:33:56 PM PDT by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
Would they set up a triage in the food court? (LOL, I know you were just being cautious)
95 posted on 04/25/2002 4:38:44 PM PDT by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Registered
I wouldn't put a deliberate choice of a 9/11 attack date past GW at all. What a delightful thought! I like it and heartily approve.
96 posted on 04/25/2002 4:43:27 PM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
"Would they set up a triage in the food court? (LOL, I know you were just being cautious)"

FWAPFWAPFWAPFWAPFWAPFWAPFWAPFWAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(virtual rasberry)

97 posted on 04/25/2002 4:46:19 PM PDT by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: crystalk
So, you're a Nostradamus Nut, eh? (she said with a tone of derision) He's made so many mistakes it's ridiculous. Then of course, there are his predictions that are so broad that they can be made to fit numerous situations.
BTW,there are an awful lot of people here who were educated in public schools-- the majority, I'd say. Did you intend to insult them all?
98 posted on 04/25/2002 4:52:08 PM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: crystalk
"I'm going off to an astrological site..."

Because of course it's more dependable, and reliable right??

99 posted on 04/25/2002 5:51:42 PM PDT by KineticKitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: right_to_defend
That's interesting. During the Gulf war didn't all these planes go on missions from Diego Garcia? Why transfer them to Qatar this time?

Shorter sorties, and thus more sorties per aircaft. We have less assets now than during the Gulf war, coming at the end of the Reagan buildup, before Bush One started the process, carried to extreme levels by the SinkMiester, of gutting the military. Actually Bush one had started cutting back, but hadn't had time to do much of it. Clinton had 8 Freeping years to cut the military to the bone, and Bush two hasn't yet had much time to do much building back up. Losing control of the Senate will make that harder too, and much more expensive, since he'll have to "give" social program spending to "get" military spending.

100 posted on 04/25/2002 5:56:31 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson