Posted on 04/23/2002 10:08:43 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:40:11 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
BRUSSELS, Belgium (AP) --
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
I also think that there is something lurking behind it that no-one wants to discuss ( at least in Europe ) and that something is fear.
Fear of all those "unassimilated" Muslims who have flooded Europe.
This kind of nonsense seriously compromises the credibility of groups like the WJC. The situation in Europe today is vastly different than in the 1930s, as evidenced by the fact that the suspects in these attacks are not Germans, or French, or Dutch, but Arabs.
If the WJC really wanted to address the problems the Jews now face in Europe, they would go out support the anti-immigration platforms of right-wing candidates all over Europe. The fact that they haven't done so tells me that their heads are still in the sand.
Every petro $ the Opecker Princes get from us and the rest of the world has a % going to finance anti-Semitism Socialism throughout Europe and over her. Then of course they finance terrorism in Israel, Europe and here.
This why Shorty Mullah Da$$hole is so critical to the Opecker Princes. By blocking our drilling for oil in Alaska, Shorty Mullah Da$$hole increases our dependence on Opec Oil. That means more of our petro$'s flow to the Opecker Princes.
Then the Opecker Princes invest those petro$'s in anti-Semitic groups in Europe, around the world and here. Their strategy is two fold. First you have the political strategy as seen by the rise of anti-Semitism in Europe and here, all which is funded by our petro $'s. Second they fund the murders who would kill every Israeli and American if they could.
The day we stop being dependent on Opecker Oil, is the day that this funding of hate and terrorism by the Opecker Princes will start to dry up. It is that simple!
I do agree with your statement that the WJC (William Jefferson Clinton?) lacks credibility when it supports certain politicians and not others.
United States | 5,800,000 |
Israel | 4,847,000 |
France | 600,000 |
Ukraine | 400,000 |
United Kingdom | 300,000 |
Hungary | 80,000 |
Belarus | 60,000 |
Germany | 60,000 |
Belgium | 40,000 |
Italy | 35,000 |
Netherlands | 30,000 |
Sweden | 18,000 |
Switzerland | 18,000 |
Latvia | 15,000 |
Romania | 14,000 |
Spain | 14,000 |
Austria | 10,000 |
Denmark | 8,000 |
Poland | 8,000 |
Greece | 5,000 |
Yugoslavia | 2,500 |
Croatia | 2,000 |
Norway | 1,500 |
Finland | 1,200 |
Ireland | 1,000 |
Portugal | 900 |
Bosnia-Herzegovina | 600 |
Luxembourg | 600 |
1. European governments today are generally "anti-Israel" for one reason -- political expediency. The simple truth is that there are far more Arabs in Europe today than Jews.
2. Europeans have historically been "anti-Israel" because the creation of Israel was a historical anomaly -- At a time in history when European nations were abandoning their colonies (under pressure from the U.S., by the way), Israel was established as a state that wasn't even a viable one due to its location, proximity to avowed enemies, lack of natural resources, and reliance on outside assistance.
3. Ironically, I would bet that Americans are more likely than Israelis to have a negative view of Europeans. Europeans make up an enormous portion of the tourists that visit Israel -- hardly a sign of anti-Semitism.
Why Jewish leaders do not see this obvious connection? Instead of fighting against Le Pen they should fight against Muslim immigration.
United States 5,800,000 Israel 4,847,000 [RUSSIA ...] France 600,000You skipped Russia!
Well, men are from Mars so perhaps you're right. However, I do know that European anti-semitism predates Moslem immigration by centuries. The French ambassador to the UK who called Israel a "sh!!ty little country" went unpunished for his remarks because he reflected the views of his government. The various European governments who are turning a blind eye to the growing anti-semitic violence are staffed by Europeans, not Moslem immigrants. I could go on and on. I believe that a deeply embedded, cultural characteristic is reasserting itself. I truly hope I'm wrong but I don't think I am.
I think if someone does some digging they will find Hitler had the support and in fact partnered with the Muslims in Europe and the Middle East in prosecuting his 'final solution.'
That's a large part of the reason for Le Pen's success the other day, IMHO.
Just wait when there are more Muslims in Europe! Calling Israel by names is a much smaller problem than sucide bombers. Bringing more Arab Muslims will make Europe more "diverse" and more Semitic, but after while Jews as well as Christians will be forced out.
It is easy to play on the Christian feeling of guilt. Try to do it with Muslims. Good luck and be careful.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.