Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George Lucas to TIME: "All democracies turn into dictatorships..."
TIME Magazine via TheForce.net ^ | April 21, 2002

Posted on 04/21/2002 7:46:09 AM PDT by Darth Sidious

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last
Red-font added for emphasis. Mr. Lucas, astute student of history that he is, has a far better grasp of reality than do most politicians inside the beltway.
1 posted on 04/21/2002 7:46:09 AM PDT by Darth Sidious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase; JohnHuang2; lowbridge; Mercuria; Sabertooth
Ping.
2 posted on 04/21/2002 7:49:51 AM PDT by Darth Sidious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darth Sidious
Ponderous, man, ponderous!
3 posted on 04/21/2002 7:54:35 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Darth Sidious
The American system is not a democracy. It is a constitutional republic. A democracy, if you attach meaning to terms, is a system of unlimited majority rule; the classic example is ancient Athens. And the symbol of it is the fate of Socrates, who was put to death legally, because the majority didn't like what he was saying, although he had initiated no force and had violated no one's rights.

Democracy, in short, is a form of collectivism, which denies individual rights: the majority can do whatever it wants with no restrictions. In principle, the democratic government is all-powerful. Democracy is a totalitarian manifestation; it is not a form of freedom....

The American system is a constitutionally limited republic, restricted to the protectrion of individual rights. In such a system, majority rule is applicable only to lesser details, such as the selection of certain personnel. But the majority has no say over the basic principles governing the government. It has no power to ask for or gain the infringement of individual rights.

--Leonard Peikfoff

4 posted on 04/21/2002 7:56:16 AM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darth Sidious
This was the same guy that said Clinton was basically a well meaning individual facing "baseless accusations of corruption" from the eevil Trade Federation Republicans. Don't take this stuff too seriously. Am I worried about our civil liberties going down the drain? Yes, but I go to the movies to forget about stuff like that for a while.
5 posted on 04/21/2002 7:58:46 AM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
Four years ago it dawned on me that the Clone Wars were going to take their cue from World War I, in terms of how the desperation/devastation would lead the Germans to rally behind Adolf Hitler. Apparently that's holding up well, 'cuz the way things are shaping up Palpatine is going to become Emperor-for-life with a gleeful rubber-stamp of approval from the public.

(BTW, I'll be at Celebration II later next week with the rest of TheForce.net staff. Looking forward to meeting any fellow Freepers who can stop by :-)

6 posted on 04/21/2002 7:59:28 AM PDT by Darth Sidious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Thank you ,Lucas doesn't deserve the country he lives on.
7 posted on 04/21/2002 8:00:40 AM PDT by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dr_who
I did a search but couldn't find anything where Lucas said that. He did tell Terrence Stamp to play Chancellor Valorum like "a beleagured Clinton", which Stamp later commented that that was before Clinton "became very beleagured" :-)

I know as much about Lucas's political leanings as anyone else does, and that's precious little in all honesty. I didn't post about that, so much as to point out that this man "gets" this much, whereas most people we've elected do not.

8 posted on 04/21/2002 8:04:36 AM PDT by Darth Sidious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dr_who
This was the same guy that said Clinton was basically a well meaning individual facing "baseless accusations of corruption" from the eevil Trade Federation Republicans.

Thanks for a reminder of a past irresponsible statement. Maybe he is having second thoughts.

9 posted on 04/21/2002 8:04:37 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Darth Sidious
This country has been a Bureaucratic Dictatorship for quite a few decades now.
10 posted on 04/21/2002 8:05:36 AM PDT by sinclair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
The American system is not a democracy. It is a constitutional republic.

When the leaders of a constitutional republic run the country by polling focus groups, it degrades into a democracy.

11 posted on 04/21/2002 8:06:30 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
"The American system is a constitutionally limited republic, restricted to the protectrion of individual rights. In such a system, majority rule is applicable only to lesser details, such as the selection of certain personnel. But the majority has no say over the basic principles governing the government. It has no power to ask for or gain the infringement of individual rights"

That was the original idea...but so many words have been re-defined over the last two+ centuries that our Constitution retains little of its original intent. This change is, IMHO, the result of human nature, which always (eventually) responds to the siren call of socialism. It is unfortunate that mere humans inhabit the Supreme Court.

12 posted on 04/21/2002 8:08:06 AM PDT by gorush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Darth Sidious
"The people give their democracy to a dictator, whether it's Julius Caesar or Napoleon or Adolf Hitler"

Or perhaps Bill Clinton.

13 posted on 04/21/2002 8:09:59 AM PDT by bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68
Rome's Republic was an oligarchy. The Weimar Republic and the thing that passed for a democracy in Italy in the post-WWI period were the stirring of still youthful nation states trying to create something of a congeries of city states, landgraves, principalities, dukedoms, etc.

Generalizations are dangerous, and syllogistically speaking "all" is a dangerous position to take.

14 posted on 04/21/2002 8:10:30 AM PDT by gaspar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
BUMP
15 posted on 04/21/2002 8:10:53 AM PDT by crazykatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: gaspar
Generalizations are dangerous, and syllogistically speaking "all" is a dangerous position to take

Except generally speaking, it is an observation that has held true 100% of the time over history.

Try as one might, there cannot be found any republic/democracy that has made it past, on average, two hundred years, and still maintained its principles. All of them deteriorated into either tyranny or stagnancy.

16 posted on 04/21/2002 8:16:15 AM PDT by Darth Sidious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
When the leaders of a constitutional republic run the country by polling focus groups, it degrades into a democracy.

I couldn't have said it any better ! Even GW refers to us as a democracy !

17 posted on 04/21/2002 8:16:22 AM PDT by smokeyb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sinclair
Ahhhhhhh, but it is a "republican" Bureaucratic Dictatorship as we elect the folks that initiate and then institutionalize the fiefdoms of Bureaucratic Dictators.

"We" the people, even as hard as "we" try to cry we are not, are indeed responsible, by either action or inaction, for the ever increasing weight of the black boot of tyranny we feel on our necks.

18 posted on 04/21/2002 8:20:49 AM PDT by ImpBill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Darth Sidious
Yes, and he's absolutely right...but he hasn't taken the additional step along this realization. Have you?

A government must be strictly *LIMITED* to prevent it from becoming tyrannical, whether it's a democracy or a monarchy.

Something of which the Anti-Federalists had an intuitive grasp and the Federalists sought to appease.
19 posted on 04/21/2002 8:22:27 AM PDT by Maelstrom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
"When the leaders of a constitutional republic run the country by polling focus groups, it degrades into a democracy."

Might also read When the electorate continues to elect and then look the other way When the leaders of a constitutional republic run the country by polling focus groups, it degrades into a democracy.

20 posted on 04/21/2002 8:23:51 AM PDT by ImpBill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson