Because he said from the very beginning, that was a PRIVATE matter. Of course someone like you who doesn't appear to think anything wrong was done in Filegate wouldn't understand that. Now why don't you tell us the motivation for the left leaning Washington Post not announcing who won? Why don't you tell us why you think the Washington Post is a credible source of ANYTHING?
What makes you think THEY are lying?
People lie under oath all the time, Howlin. Didn't YOU say that or something to that effect when we were discussing the depositions in Filegate and the Clinton related crimes?
What proof do YOU have that THEY are lying?
What PROOF do YOU have that Klayman is? You can't even identify a single untruth in his press releases and court documents on Chinagate, Filegate, Emailgate, the Riady non-refund and the death of Brown. I've asked you to do so a number a times and all you've done is RUN. Klayman seems to have a pretty good track record for telling the truth ... at about the same time that the smear article you posted came out.
Who knows, maybe Larry thought his grandmother still had some money and when he found out she had given it to her daughter, he sued.
See, just like democRATS your ONLY debating tactics are repeating and making SMEARS up. Did you graduate from the Carville school?
BTW, there were SEVERAL people who signed affadavits backing the Mother's side; are they ALL lying? Why would they?
Gee, you mean impartial witnesses like the 2nd husband of the wife ... the one with much to gain from STEALING money from his invalid grandmother-in-law who he threw out on the street? And, again, did they win, Howlin? I'm sure with your democRAT sources you can find out for us.
Care to back that up? I never, ever said that nothing wrong was done. You're making stuff up again.
And, of course, people lie in depositions; I'm just interested in the reason why you all assume automatically that they are the ones doing the lying. Because Larry says so?
BTW, if it's so private, why does he even take questions about it?